Texas Weekly Online

Lawyers challenge deportation of hundreds of minors to Guatemala

Lawyers challenge deportation of hundreds of minors to Guatemala

Immigrant rights lawyers asked a federal judge in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday to block the Trump administration from deporting hundreds of Guatemalan minors, arguing they could face neglect or persecution at home. The migrants’ attorneys said their clients, who ranged from 10 to 17 years old, were at imminent risk of removal despite some having pending asylum cases or other legal claims that had not fully been vetted by the courts. The attorneys said trafficking and immigration laws “prevent unaccompanied children from being whisked off under cover of darkness at the whim of any government.” The minors in question are currently in Health and Human Services custody and have no legal guardians in the United States, the attorneys said. BIDEN JUDGE HALTS ‘SURPRISING’ ILLEGAL ALIEN MINOR REPATRIATION PLAN AFTER ADVOCACY GROUPS SUE The migrants’ legal team is now seeking a longer-term injunction to replace Judge Sparkle Sooknanan’s emergency order over the holiday weekend blocking the deportations for up to two weeks. Sooknanan granted the order after learning that more than six dozen of the minors had been transferred from HHS to Immigration and Customs Enforcement custody overnight and placed on a plane bound for Guatemala.  The case has drawn attention both because it involves what lawyers say could be about 600 minors at risk of being abruptly removed from the country and because Sooknanan, the judge initially presiding over the case, imposed an immediate restraining order on the Trump administration to halt the removals. Sooknanan’s order came after a separate judge in D.C. gave a controversial oral order in March to return alleged Tren de Aragua gang members to the United States, which the Trump administration argued was ambiguous and not binding. Seeking to avoid such a dispute, Sooknanan, a Biden appointee, left no room for interpretation. Sooknanan gave quick, unequivocal orders over Labor Day weekend to deplane the minors and return them to the HHS Office of Refugee Resettlement. The judge demanded status updates from the Department of Justice every few hours until the process was complete. The DOJ complied with her orders. TRUMP DHS SUES ENTIRE BENCH OF FEDERAL JUDGES IN MARYLAND DISTRICT COURT OVER AUTOMATIC INJUNCTIONS The lawsuit was brought by ten underage Guatemalan migrants who were living in the country without a guardian or documentation. Their attorneys described them in court papers as “vulnerable children” entitled to “enhanced protection and care.” The attorneys said the Trump administration was blowing past laws and the Constitution in an effort to illegally deport them. Sooknanan granted a class action lawsuit so that the case would cover not just the ten plaintiffs but all other minors similarly situated in the custody of HHS. After Labor Day, the case was reassigned to Judge Timothy Kelly, a Trump appointee. Kelly has set a hearing for next week over the migrants’ new request for a preliminary injunction. The migrants’ attorneys said they had learned from media reports that ICE was planning to “imminently” deport them to Guatemala, where they “may face abuse, neglect, persecution, or even torture.” Federal authorities “woke children in the night and subjected them to the trauma of imminent removal,” the attorneys wrote in court papers. “But for this Court’s intervention while the plane sat on the tarmac in Texas, those children would have been expelled to Guatemala,” they said. A DOJ lawyer told the judge during the last-minute hearings over the weekend that the Guatemalan government had requested the return of the migrant youths and that “all of these children have their parents or guardians in Guatemala who are requesting their return.” A Department of Homeland Security spokeswoman called the initial temporary restraining order from the judge “disgusting,” contending that the DHS was simply aiming to reconnect the young migrants with their parents. “Judge Sparkle [Sooknanan] is blocking flights to *reunify* Guatemalan children with their families,” DHS spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin wrote. “Now these children have to go to shelters. This is disgusting and immoral.”

Trump admin to send workers abroad to boost US shipbuilding, counter China’s edge

Trump admin to send workers abroad to boost US shipbuilding, counter China’s edge

FIRST ON FOX: The U.S. Labor Department is planning to partner up with allies like South Korea and Japan to train U.S. workers to become shipbuilders under President Donald Trump’s push to revitalize the industry.  While China is massively outpacing the U.S. when it comes to shipbuilding, the Labor Department announced an $8 million funding availability Thursday for an international fellowship program that will pair up U.S. institutions with foreign counterparts to remedy this disparity.  The four-year proposed project will team up U.S. training centers, registered apprenticeship programs, education institutions like community colleges with foreign training centers, and shipyards in Canada, Finland, Italy, Japan, South Korea and other countries to provide U.S. workers with advanced shipbuilding skills, according to the Labor Department.  TRUMP DEPARTMENT OF LABOR TO ABSORB SOME EDUCATION DEPARTMENT RESPONSIBILITIES The fellowship, led by the Labor Department’s Bureau of International Labor Affairs, will prioritize training for boilermakers, industrial electricians, steelworkers, steamfitters, shipwrights and welders. Likewise, the funding will also go toward creating a specialized, internationally recognized trade curriculum aimed at fostering more advanced training in the U.S. The initiative seeks to garner knowledge from allies and distribute it more widely among workers within the U.S. to expand shipbuilding trade skills domestically.  “Working closely with our allies will advance the Department of Labor’s mission to create effective shipbuilding apprenticeship programs right here in the United States,” Secretary of Labor Lori Chavez-DeRemer said in a statement to Fox News Digital. “President Trump is restoring America’s maritime dominance by preparing our workforce to outcompete China and strengthen our national security.” HELP WANTED: US MUST FILL LOTS OF SHIPS-AND-CHIPS JOBS TO BEAT CHINA The U.S. is severely behind near-peer competitors like China when it comes to shipbuilding — and allies like South Korea and Japan.  China is responsible for more than 50% of global shipbuilding, while South Korea is responsible for nearly 29% and Japan 13%, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies. That’s compared to just 0.1% from the U.S.  “The erosion of U.S. and allied shipbuilding capabilities poses an urgent threat to military readiness, reduces economic opportunities, and contributes to China’s global power-projection ambitions,” the Center for Strategic and International Studies said in a March report.  But Trump has directed his attention to the industry, and told lawmakers in March that he would “resurrect” both commercial and military shipbuilding. Additionally, Trump signed an executive order in April aimed at reinvigorating the U.S. shipbuilding sector.  Specifically, the executive order called for assessments regarding how the government could bolster financial support through the Defense Production Act, the Department of Defense Office of Strategic Capital, a new Maritime Security Trust Fund, investment from shipbuilders from allied countries and other grant programs. PENTAGON MAY SINK BIDEN-ERA DEAL TO SELL AUSTRALIA NUCLEAR-POWERED SUBMARINES It also instructed agencies to develop a maritime action plan and ordered the U.S. trade representative to compile a list of recommendations to address China’s “anticompetitive actions within the shipbuilding industry.”  The new fellowship program stems from Trump’s executive order, according to the Labor Department.  Those eligible to apply for the funding opportunity include any commercial, international, educational, or nonprofit organizations. That includes any faith-based organizations, community-based organizations or public international organizations. The application deadline is Sept. 26. 

GOP duo unveils plan to force Congress to ‘face consequences’ as shutdown looms

GOP duo unveils plan to force Congress to ‘face consequences’ as shutdown looms

FIRST ON FOX: A pair of congressional Republicans is determined to keep the government open and willing to force their colleagues to stay in Washington, D.C., to get it done. Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla., and Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Texas, plan to introduce legislation that would keep lawmakers in town until a short-term government funding extension, known as a continuing resolution (CR), or spending bills are passed to avert a partial government shutdown. TRUMP’S FOREIGN AID CLAWBACK RATTLES SENATE AHEAD OF FUNDING FIGHT Congress still does not have a plan in place to ward off a shutdown by the Sept. 30 deadline, and both sides of the aisle have already started the annual blame game as to which party would own the partial closure. So far, the Senate has advanced a trio of spending bills, while the House has passed only two — although lawmakers in the lower chamber were gearing up to advance the Energy and Water appropriations bill on Thursday. Lankford said in a statement to Fox News Digital that as the nation’s debt creeps beyond $37 trillion, “Congress cannot keep avoiding the hard choices to fix it.” GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN, EPSTEIN FILES, DC CRIME: CONGRESS RETURNS TO MOUNTAIN OF DRAMA “Shutting down the government does not fix the debt problem, it just makes it worse,” he said. “The best way to finish negotiating the hard issue is to keep Congress in Washington until the budget is finished. That puts the pressure on lawmakers, not on families and important services.” If Congress fails to get a deal in place to keep the government open, the duo’s bill would trigger an automatic CR “on rolling 14-day periods” that would stay in place until lawmakers either pass all 12 appropriations bills or strike a deal on a stopgap bill. The bill would also force Congress, their staff and members of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to stay in D.C. until the job is done. It would require that no motions to adjourn or recess could be made for longer than 23 hours, mandatory quorum calls each day to ensure attendance, and no other legislation would be allowed to be considered until a CR or spending bills were passed. “In the real world, if you fail to do your job, there are consequences,” Arrington said in a statement to Fox News Digital. “Yet, when Congress fails to pass appropriations on time, the burden falls squarely on hardworking Americans — taxpayers, seniors, and our men and women in uniform.” Meanwhile, appropriators in the House and Senate are working to find a path forward on a deal. WHITE HOUSE MOVE TO CANCEL $4.9B FOREIGN AID WITH ‘POCKET RESCISSION’ BLASTED AS ILLEGAL Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said he hoped the CR would originate in the House, based off negotiations between House Appropriations Chair Tom Cole, R-Okla., and Senate Appropriations Chair Susan Collins, R-Maine. “My hope would be that whatever that CR looks like, it’s clean, and that it enables us to buy some time to get a regular appropriations process done,” he said. But the White House’s move last week to cancel $4.9 billion in foreign aid funding through a “pocket rescission” has some Republicans worried that it could jeopardize the bipartisan nature of the appropriations process in the Senate, where Democrats will be needed to keep the government open. So far, it appears that Senate Democrats aren’t ready to totally buck their Republican counterparts, but are demanding that they be involved in negotiations to craft a CR. “If House Republicans, however, go a different route and try and jam through a partisan CR without any input from Democratic members of Congress, and they suddenly find they don’t have the votes they need from our caucus to fund the government, well, then that is a Republican shutdown,” said Sen. Patty Murray, of Washington., top-ranking Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee.

NASA says America will win ‘the second space race’ against China

NASA says America will win ‘the second space race’ against China

FIRST ON FOX: In a newly released video obtained by Fox News Digital, NASA Acting Administrator Sean Duffy announced that America will travel back to the Moon before President Donald Trump leaves office, and declared the U.S. will win “the second space race” against China. The video reveals Duffy’s vision for the agency after Trump appointed him acting administrator while also serving as Secretary of Transportation.  “We’re going back to the moon, and this time, when we plant our flag, we stay,” Duffy explains in the video. “I’m committed to getting us back to the moon before President Trump leaves office.” TRUMP PLANS TO MOVE SPACE COMMAND TO ALABAMA, COUNTERING BIDEN ORDER TO KEEP IT IN COLORADO “China wants to get there, but we’re getting there first,” Duffy added. “We will win the second space race.” The former Wisconsin Congressman is the first head of NASA who has acknowledged a space race against China, as the Transportation Secretary looks to accomplish the exploration goals Trump has long pushed for.  Duffy says the Artemis program, named after the twin sister of the Greek Olympian god Apollo, will ultimately get the United States to Mars, indicating that the key space program originated under President Trump’s first term will be an important part of the United States’ dominance in space travel.  RETIRED NASA ASTRONAUT EXPLAINS HOW ROBOTS COULD SHAPE SPACE EXPLORATION American astronauts haven’t touched the surface of the moon since the Apollo 17 mission in 1972. The Artemis I mission, completed in 2022, ended in a successful splashdown after launching the sizable Space Launch System (SLS) and orbiting the Orion spacecraft around the moon during a 25-day mission.  Duffy indicated that the Artemis program is here to stay, despite the president proposing a 24% cut to the agency in his budget. CONGRESS RETURNS WITH DEMOCRATS REFUSING TO NEGOTIATE AS OCT 1 SHUTDOWN DEADLINE LOOMS The congressional vote on the federal funding budget was pushed through Sep 30, 2025, by means of a full continuing resolution to fund the government, but the deadline quickly approaches at the end of this month as Congress braces for an additional continuing resolution, passage, or a possible government shutdown. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP While the Artemis program was thought to be on the chopping block in the proposed multi-billion dollar slash to NASA, sources at the agency told Fox News Digital that Artemis will play a major role in space exploration and will not be fully gutted by the proposal.  “Our program is called Artemis,” Duffy said. “And what we learn through Artemis gets us to Mars.”

DHS unveils extensive criminal history for Seattle-based illegal migrant who served in the US military

DHS unveils extensive criminal history for Seattle-based illegal migrant who served in the US military

FIRST ON FOX: The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) revealed that an illegal migrant from Pakistan, who served in the U.S. military, has an extensive history of criminal activity paired with “lies about his military service.” Muhammad Zahid Chaudhry originally entered the U.S. in 1998 on a B-2 visa after intentionally leaving out criminal history related to convictions in Australia for stealing goods, falsifying passports and committing financial misconduct, according to DHS. DHS told Fox News Digital that Chaudhry also claimed he was deployed to Iraq, though Department of Defense records show he was never actually deployed. An official with the Department of Defense told Fox News Digital that illegal migrants cannot serve in the military and an individual must have some form of legal status in order to serve. Green card holders (permanent legal residents) are able to join a branch of the U.S. military. Immigration officials at the U.S. Customs and Immigration Services (USCIS) determined Chaudhry’s falsified forms and omitting of criminal history were grounds for removal in 2008, but the Pakistani native has been repeatedly appealing the decision for roughly 17 years. DHS RAGES OVER WHAT IT CALLS A NYT ‘SOB STORY’ ABOUT CONVICTED JAMAICAN MURDERER DEPORTED BY TRUMP “Sanctuary politician Bruce Harrell and the media are peddling a FALSE sob story on this serial fraudster,” DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin told Fox News Digital. “President Trump and Secretary Noem’s message is clear: Criminal illegal aliens are not welcome in the United States.” “Why do sanctuary politicians and the media continue to peddle sob stories of criminal illegals and smear our brave ICE law enforcement officers?” McLaughlin added. “Make no mistake, these types of lies are contributing to our ICE law enforcement officers facing a 1000% increase in assaults.” According to an Inspector General’s report obtained by Fox News Digital from 2021, Chaudhry collected $449,459.82 in taxpayer dollars from the Department of Veterans Affairs’ Veteran’s Benefits Administration (VBA) and currently owes the federal government $81,080 for a mortgage reduction grant from the VBA.  Sources at the Department of Homeland Security told Fox that Chaudhry entered the country on a B-2 tourist visa and then was granted a green card. After officials discovered he previously lied to immigration officials about his criminal past, the green card was revoked — making him an illegal migrant in the U.S. KRISTI NOEM ACCUSES CBS NEWS OF ‘SHAMEFULLY’ EDITING HER INTERVIEW ABOUT KILMAR ABREGO GARCIA Chaudhry remains detained by the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) after being arrested during a citizenship appearance in Tukwila, Washington, on Aug. 21, 2025. He has been placed into removal proceedings after an immigration judge ruled he was in violation of federal immigration law.  Protests in Seattle have since erupted as hundreds of demonstrators stood outside the ICE detention center demanding Chaudhry’s release last week. Seattle radio host Jason Rantz told Fox News Digital that Democrats have tried to “portray [Chaudhry] as some sort of victim.” GOP LAWMAKERS AIM TO HIKE PENALTIES ON ‘RADICAL LEFT’ AS ICE ATTACKS RISE BY OVER 800% “Muhammad Chaudhry has a criminal history which he failed to disclose, and has already had permanent residence status rejected by a judge,” Rantz from Seattle Red 770 AM told Fox. “And yet Democrats still portray him as some sort of victim.”  “If you want to understand why Democrats continue to make no distinction between criminal illegal immigrants and hard-working ones who just want a better life, it’s pretty easy now,” Rantz added. “When you don’t believe in borders, you don’t see a difference.” Chaudhry’s wife Melissa, who did not respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment, is running for U.S. Congress in Washington’s 9th District after losing in the Democratic primary in 2024.

HHS Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr to face Senate panel after CDC turmoil

HHS Secretary Robert F Kennedy Jr to face Senate panel after CDC turmoil

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is set to testify on Capitol Hill on Thursday, a week after turmoil engulfed the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Lawmakers on the Senate Finance Committee, which has jurisdiction over the HHS, will hear from Kennedy on President Donald Trump’s healthcare agenda, dubbed by the secretary as the Make America Healthy Again movement. While the committee does not directly oversee the CDC, the recent firing of former CDC Director Susan Monarez, the wave of high-level officials departing and other moves at the agency taken under Kennedy’s tenure are expected to dominate the line of questioning from both Republicans and Democratic lawmakers on the panel. SENATORS DEMAND OVERSIGHT, REJECT VACCINE GUIDANCE AS ILLEGITIMATE AS CDC TURMOIL RAGES Senate Majority Leader John Thune, who is a member of the panel, told reporters that Kennedy would face “hard questions” from committee members, particularly over frustrations over Monarez, who was confirmed by the Senate less than a month before her ouster. “He’s gotta take responsibility… we confirm these people,” the South Dakota Republican said. “We go through a lot of work to get them confirmed. And they’re in office a month?” Speculation has swirled over the reason behind Monarez’s firing given her differing stance on vaccines compared to Kennedy, who spent much of his presidential campaign and tenure as secretary going after the efficacy and safety of vaccination, particularly those for COVID-19. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., who chairs the Senate health committee and was the deciding vote that propelled Kennedy to a role in the Trump administration, is also set to question the secretary. Last week, he demanded that the federal government’s vaccine advisory panel, which was filled with Kennedy’s handpicked replacements after he recently booted the original panel members, postpone its scheduled meeting in September until “significant oversight” was carried out by his committee, and charged that any recommendations made by the advisory panel should be rejected until then. RFK JR. DETAILS HOW HE PLANS ON RESTORING PUBLIC TRUST IN THE CDC IN NEW OP-ED Cassidy told Fox News Digital that he was working on just what the oversight measures would look like and expected to announce his plans soon. In the meantime, he noted that he was supportive of Kennedy and Trump’s commitment to “radical transparency,” but noted that his main concerns were about children’s health.   “It isn’t about R versus D. It isn’t about, you know, internecine fights within the Republican Party. It is about children and grandchildren, and will they die or be at risk of dying from vaccine-preventable disease,” Cassidy said. “Now we’ve got to get to the truth of this.” He also argued that members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices are supposed to receive materials to review before making vaccine recommendations and decisions, but questioned where the information would be coming from in the wake of several senior members of the CDC making their exit after Monarez’s firing. “We’ve got to have some sort of radical transparency into what scientific justification is being used for that,” he said. “Is it a political appointee? Well, to say a political appointee is making scientific recommendations. Who’s a political appointee? I mean, are they a doctor, a PhD, or are they a political appointee? Our concern is they might just be political appointees, but we’re going to find that out.” PREVIOUS CDC DIRECTORS ACCUSE RFK JR. OF ENDANGERING ALL AMERICANS IN NY TIMES ESSAY Sen. Steve Daines, R-Mont., another member of the Senate Finance Committee, told Fox News Digital that his line of questioning would focus on the abortion drug Mifepristone and its safety, but added that it was “fair” for lawmakers to have debate over Kennedy’s leadership of the CDC and HHS. “It’s typical for any secretary that comes up, but I’m sure many of these issues that have been raised are related to some concerns. These questions are going to be asked, and I’m grateful that the Secretary will be there to explain what he sees going on and the path forward,” he said. Meanwhile, Kennedy defended his moves at the CDC in a Wall Street Journal opinion piece on Tuesday and contended that “President Trump has asked me to restore that trust and return the CDC to its core mission.” He wrote that steps have already been taken to “eliminate conflicts of interest and bureaucratic complacency” at the agency, and that leaders who “resisted reform” had already been replaced. “Most CDC rank-and-file staff are honest public servants,” Kennedy said. “Under this renewed mission, they can do their jobs as scientists without bowing to politics. The agency will again become the world authority on infectious-disease policy.” “First, the CDC must restore public trust — and that restoration has begun,” he continued. “It won’t stop until America’s public-health institutions again serve the people with transparency, honesty and integrity.” Fox News Digital reached out to the HHS for comment but did not hear back immediately. 

Trump-backed redistricting push turns Midwestern state into next political battleground

Trump-backed redistricting push turns Midwestern state into next political battleground

The high-stakes political fistfight between Republicans and Democrats over congressional redistricting ahead of next year’s midterm elections shifted to a new battleground this week. A special session of Missouri’s legislature to redraw the solidly red state’s congressional districts and give the GOP control of one additional House seat kicked off on Wednesday with public hearings scheduled for Thursday. “Missouri’s conservative, common-sense values should be truly represented at all levels of government, and the Missouri First Map delivers just that,” Republican Gov. Mike Kehoe argued, as he announced the special session and unveiled a proposed map. MAJOR REPUBLICAN REDISTRICTING VICTORY IN THIS KEY STATE Kehoe’s move came hours after GOP Gov. Greg Abbott of Texas on Friday signed into law a redistricting bill passed by the Republican super majority in the state legislature that aims to create up to five right-leaning congressional districts at the expense of currently Democrat-controlled seats in the reliably red state. The Republican push in Texas, which came at the urging of President Donald Trump, is part of a broad effort by the GOP across the country to pad their razor-thin House majority to keep control of the chamber in the 2026 midterms, when the party in power traditionally faces political headwinds and loses seats. WATCH: CALIFORNIA DEMOCRATS AIM TO COUNTER TEXAS REDISTRICTING Trump, in a social media post, argued that Missouri voters will have “the tremendous opportunity to elect an additional MAGA Republican in the 2026 Midterm Elections.” Trump and his political team are aiming to prevent what happened during his first term in the White House when Democrats stormed back to grab the House majority in the 2018 midterm elections. Democrats are fighting back against the rare, but not unheard-of mid-decade redistricting. State lawmakers in heavily blue California last week approved a special ballot proposition this November to obtain voter approval to temporarily sidetrack the state’s nonpartisan redistricting commission and return the power to draw the congressional maps to the Democrat-dominated legislature. TRUMP NOT ON BALLOT BUT FRONT-AND-CENTER IN 2025 ELECTIONS The effort in California, which aims to create five more Democratic-leaning congressional districts and counter the shift in Texas, is being spearheaded by two-term Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is seen as a likely 2028 Democratic presidential contender. In Missouri, the new map proposed by Kehoe targets longtime Democratic Rep. Emanuel Cleaver’s Kansas City area district by shifting it eastward to include rural right-leaning voters.  If passed by the GOP-controlled legislature, the new map would likely flip Cleaver’s seat and give Republicans a 7-1 advantage in the state’s U.S. House delegation. The Missouri legislature’s special session will also tackle another top Republican priority – a proposed constitutional amendment making it more difficult to approve citizen-driven ballot initiatives. Abortion-rights and marijuana legalization amendments, opposed by many Republican leaders in the state, have passed in recent years. Missouri state House Minority Leader Ashley Aune on Monday charged that Kehoe and Republican state lawmakers are pushing to “rig our maps and eliminate our representation in Congress.” Former Rep. Russ Carnahan, the chair of the Missouri Democrats, warned there are political consequences for Republicans pushing to redistrict. “They’re choosing to bow down to Washington demands to do some things that I think are going to stir the ire of Missouri voters, and they’re about to see what pissed off Missouri voters look like,” Carnahan told Fox News Digital. But Democrats in the Missouri state house have limited options to stop the legislature from passing the new map. Unlike in Texas, where Democratic state representatives fled the state for two weeks to delay passage of redistricting, a similar move by Missouri Democrats wouldn’t prevent a quorum needed to conduct business. And any filibuster by Democrats in Missouri’s state Senate would likely be quickly shut down by the majority Republicans. Cleaver, whose seat is threatened, has vowed to take legal action if the new map is signed into law by the governor. With Democrats currently needing just a three-seat pick-up in next year’s midterms to win back the House majority, Missouri and Texas are far from the only states where Trump and his political allies are urging Republicans to re-write the maps to create more right-leaning congressional districts. Top Republican state lawmakers in Indiana, which, similar to Missouri, is a former battleground state that’s now red, visited the White House last week to discuss redistricting. Republicans in GOP-controlled South Carolina and Florida are also mulling redistricting ahead of the 2026 elections. And right-leaning Ohio is under a court order to draw new maps ahead of the midterms. Democrats, as they push back, are looking to New York, Illinois and Maryland in the hopes of creating more left-leaning congressional seats. But they have less attractive options than Republicans.  They control fewer states than the GOP and face constitutional limitations or nonpartisan redistricting commissions, which is the case in New York. In Illinois and Maryland, where Govs. J.B. Pritzker and Wes Moore are discussing redistricting, Democrats hope to pick up to three more left-leaning seats. And they could pick up a seat in right-leaning Utah, where a judge recently ordered the GOP-controlled legislature to draw new maps after ruling that lawmakers four years ago ignored an independent commission approved by voters to prevent partisan gerrymandering.  Fox News Digital reached out to Kehoe’s office to request an interview but did not immediately hear back. 

After high-profile divorce, Ashley Biden reflects on ‘one of the hardest summers’

After high-profile divorce, Ashley Biden reflects on ‘one of the hardest summers’

Ashley Biden, daughter of former President Joe Biden and former first lady Jill Biden, wrote on social media that it was “one of the hardest summers of my life.” The post comes after a summer during which the former first daughter faced two main challenges: her divorce and her father’s cancer diagnosis. “August 2025. The summer of 2025 was one of the hardest summers of my life. I have been preparing for the fall (my fav season) and now ready for the RISE,” she wrote as the caption of a carousel of summer photos. “Grateful for the support of friends and family. Grateful that I took the time/space to grieve, process and heal. Grateful for peace of mind, new beginnings, new seasons, and a rediscovered strength and love for myself.”  She ended the caption with “#SturgeonMoon2025” – a reference to the August full moon – followed by a string of emojis. ASHLEY BIDEN FILES FOR DIVORCE FROM HUSBAND, HOWARD KREIN, AFTER 13 YEARS OF MARRIAGE: REPORTS Last month, Ashley Biden shared a photo of her with her ex-husband and another woman, who the former first daughter identified as the doctor’s “girlfriend.” She captioned the Instagram story, “my husband and his girlfriend holding hands,” and posted it with the Notorious B.I.G. song “Another,” featuring Lil’ Kim, the New York Post reported.  The outlet also noted that the Instagram story was posted just hours before Ashley Biden filed for divorce from her husband of 13 years.  FEW PRESIDENTS HAVE BOWED OUT LIKE BIDEN. HISTORIANS EXPLAIN WHAT IT MEANS The story appeared on Aug. 10 and was deleted shortly after it was posted. While it appeared to be aimed at her husband, the people in the image faced away from the camera and were not immediately identifiable. The Post also reported in August that in a separate Instagram story, which was also deleted, Ashley Biden posted herself walking through a park giving a thumbs-up while “Freedom” by Beyoncé played. Ashley Biden’s divorce filing states the marriage is “irretrievably broken” and requests spousal support while the divorce is pending, according to filings reviewed by Radar Online. She married Dr. Howard Krein in 2012 with a ceremony blending her Catholic faith with his Jewish heritage, followed by a reception at the Biden family’s lake house in Wilmington.  At the time, then–Vice President Joe Biden praised his future son-in-law, telling People magazine: “This is the right guy. And he’s getting a helluva woman.” At the 2024 Democratic National Convention, Ashley Biden recalled her father’s role in her wedding to Krein, saying, “At the time, my dad was vice president, but he was also that dad who literally set up the entire reception. He was riding around in his John Deere 4-wheeler, fixing the place settings, arranging the plants, and by the way, he was very emotional.” In May, Biden’s office confirmed he had been diagnosed with an “aggressive form” of prostate cancer. “While this represents a more aggressive form of the disease, the cancer appears to be hormone-sensitive which allows for effective management. The [former p]resident and his family are reviewing treatment options with his physicians,” Biden’s team shared in a statement. Ashley Biden made a similar Instagram reflection post at the end of May, writing: “May 2025. Heartbroken yet HOPEFUL. MAY I have the courage to handle all that life throws at me (us). So very grateful for all the love + support.” “Life is tough my darling, but so are YOU,” she added at the time. On the same day, she also posted a picture of herself with her parents and seemingly pushed back against rumors that her family had covered up her father’s cancer diagnosis while he was in the White House. Fox News Digital’s Jasmine Baehr contributed to this report.

US appeals court blocks Trump use of Alien Enemies Act in deportation drive

US appeals court blocks Trump use of Alien Enemies Act in deportation drive

A federal appeals court has ruled that the administration of United States President Donald Trump illegally invoked a wartime law to deport Venezuelans as part of its immigration crackdown. Late on Tuesday, a majority on the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to expedite deportations without due process. The decision was remarkable on several fronts. It was the first time a federal appellate court had weighed Trump’s use of the 18th-century law, but it was also a strong rebuke to Trump’s mass deportation campaign from a court with a reputation for leaning conservative. Writing for the majority on the three-person bench, Judge Leslie Southwick rejected Trump’s claim that the Venezuelan gang Tren de Aragua represented an invasion into the US. “We conclude that the findings do not support that an invasion or a predatory incursion has occurred,” Southwick wrote. “We therefore conclude that petitioners are likely to prove that the AEA [Alien Enemies Act] was improperly invoked.” The Alien Enemies Act has the power to give the government wide-ranging powers to detain and deport citizens of “hostile” foreign nations, but only in times of war or during an “invasion or predatory incursion”. Before Trump, the law had only been used three times — and exclusively during war. But Trump officials have used the law to justify the rapid deportation of Venezuelan migrants, on the basis that they constitute a criminal “invasion” across the border. Southwick, who was appointed by Republican President George W Bush, rejected that argument. Advertisement “There is no finding that this mass immigration was an armed, organized force or forces,” Southwick wrote. The panel is the highest federal court to so far rule on Trump’s attempts to use the law for deportations. The case is expected to eventually make its way to the US Supreme Court. Tuesday’s ruling, however, was limited in scope: It only applies to states under the appeals court’s jurisdiction — Texas, Louisiana and Mississippi — though it could be cited as a precedent in other appeals court circuits. Trump first invoked the Alien Enemies Act on March 15, publishing an executive order that accused the Tren de Aragua gang of “perpetrating, attempting, and threatening an invasion or predatory incursion” into the US. That same day, his administration flew two planeloads of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador’s Terrorism Confinement Centre (CECOT), a maximum-security prison notorious for human rights abuses. That came despite a lower judge’s order blocking his use of the law while the flights were under way. Trump officials accused the Venezuelan migrants on those flights of being Tren de Aragua members, though their lawyers point out that many of them had no criminal records. To meet the standards for using the Alien Enemies Act, the Trump administration has repeatedly claimed that Tren de Aragua is controlled by Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, a longtime rival of the Republican leader. Trump has accused Maduro of masterminding a “narco-terrorism enterprise” in a coordinated effort to destabilise the US. But a declassified US intelligence memo has contradicted this claim, saying there is no evidence that Maduro coordinated with Tren de Aragua. On Tuesday, the US announced it had attacked a boat carrying 11 alleged Tren de Aragua members in international waters in the Caribbean, killing all on board. Trump claimed they were “narcoterrorists”. Cases related to Trump’s use of the Alien Enemies Act have twice reached the US Supreme Court, which has not yet addressed the underlying validity of the Trump administration’s actions. In April, the Supreme Court ruled that deportations under the act could proceed, but that immigrants should have “reasonable time” to contest their removals. It also decided that such challenges should be brought in the federal districts where the deportees are being held, as opposed to courts elsewhere in the country. In a second ruling, also in April, the Supreme Court blocked the deportations of a group of Venezuelan men in northern Texas. Advertisement Then, in May, the Supreme Court extended the block, faulting the Trump administration for attempting to swiftly remove detainees just one day after providing them with deportation notices. “Notice roughly 24 hours before removal, devoid of information about how to exercise due process rights to contest that removal, surely does not pass muster,” the majority opinion said. The case was ultimately sent back to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. In a statement after Tuesday’s decision, Lee Gelernt, a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), called the ruling a “critically important decision reining in the administration’s view that it can simply declare an emergency without any oversight by the courts”. The ACLU represented the Venezuelan men in the case. But there was one judge who dissented from Tuesday’s decision on the Fifth Circuit Court: Andrew Oldham, a Trump appointee. Oldham argued that deportations under the Alien Enemies Act were “matters of political judgment” and that the president has the right to determine whether the appropriate conditions were met. “From the dawn of our nation until President Trump took office a second time, courts have never second-guessed the President’s invocation of that Act,” Oldham wrote. Adblock test (Why?)