House GOP will sue DOJ next week to get Biden-Hur audio tapes, Johnson says
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said House Republicans will file a lawsuit next week to force the Department of Justice (DOJ) to hand over audio tapes of Special Counsel Robert Hur’s interview with President Biden. “We are going to file a suit next week against the – against the Department of Justice to enforce that subpoena. We’ll go to district court here in D.C., which is the appropriate venue, and we will fight vigorously to get it,” Johnson told reporters at his regular press conference. Attorney General Merrick Garland refused House GOP investigators’ subpoena for the audio tapes, citing Biden’s claim of executive privilege. JOHNSON FLOATS DEFUNDING SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE AMID JACK SMITH’S TRUMP PROBE Hur declined to prosecute Biden over his handling of classified documents and said the 81-year-old president presented himself “as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory,” and that “it would be difficult to convince a jury that they should convict him-by then a former president well into his eighties-of a serious felony that requires a mental state of willfulness.” Biden and his allies aggressively pushed back on concerns about his mental fitness in the report’s wake. The DOJ has also released the full transcript of their interview. JOHNSON FLOATS DEFUNDING SPECIAL COUNSEL’S OFFICE AMID JACK SMITH’S TRUMP PROBE But Republicans seeking the audio recording argue it would provide critical context about Biden’s state of mind. Democrats, meanwhile, have dismissed the request as a partisan attempt to politicize the DOJ. Garland’s refusal spurred House Republicans to hold him in contempt earlier this month, referring Garland to his own department for criminal charges. The DOJ ultimately declined to prosecute. Johnson’s fresh threat comes, however, as Rep. Anna Paulina Luna, R-Fla., prepares to force a vote on her own “inherent contempt” resolution against Garland. It’s a little-used congressional procedure that would direct the sergeant at arms to detain Garland for a trial by the House itself. TRUMP GUILTY VERDICT REVEALS SPLIT AMONG FORMER GOP PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY OPPONENTS The measure has not been used since the 1930s and has never been used on a Cabinet official. Johnson, when asked about Luna’s plan during his press conference, said, “I’ve talked to Anna Paulina Luna and other colleagues about various ideas, but I don’t think anything’s been settled on as of yet.” Fox News Digital reached out to the DOJ for comment.
Biden officials pushed to drop age limit on trans surgeries for minors: report
Health officials in the Biden administration urged an international transgender health nonprofit to omit the age limit in its guidelines for transgender surgical procedures for adolescents – and succeeded – according to recently unsealed court documents. The documents – first reported on by The New York Times – revealed that staff for Rachel Levine, assistant secretary for the Department of Health and Human Services pushed the World Professional Association for Transgender Health (WPATH) to drop the age minimum requirement altogether to avoid seeing conservative lawmakers work to put such age restrictions into law. The 2021 draft guidelines suggested 17 for genital surgeries or hysterectomies, 16 for breast augmentation or facial surgeries, 15 for mastectomies, and 14 for hormonal treatments. But the finalized WPATH 2022 guidelines did not include any age limit, the Times reported. BIDEN SLAMMED ON SOCIAL MEDIA AFTER ANNOUNCING TRANSGENDER DAY OF VISIBILITY ON EASTER SUNDAY Excerpts of emails within WPATH’s advisory group were included in legal filings for a federal lawsuit challenging Alabama’s ban on transgender surgeries for minors, as released by the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama. The lawsuit was filed by the National Center for Lesbian Rights and the Southern Poverty Law Center on behalf of five transgender children and their families, the Times reported. One email from a member of the WPATH guideline development group described a conversation with Sarah Boateng, then-Levine’s chief of staff. According to the email, Boateng was confident that specifying ages under 18 could lead to “devastating legislation for trans care.” “She wonders if the specific ages can be taken out,” the excerpt read. TRANSGENDER ATHLETE COMPLAINS ABOUT LACK OF SPORTSMANSHIP FROM FELLOW RUNNERS AFTER WINNING GIRLS STATE TITLE Levine “was very concerned that having ages (mainly for surgery) will affect access to care for trans youth and maybe adults, too,” another email read. “Apparently the situation in the U.S.A. is terrible and she and the Biden administration worried that having ages in the document will make matters worse. She asked us to remove them.” James Cantor, a psychologist and critic of adolescent transgender procedures, filed the excerpts from the emails as evidence in support of Alabama’s federal lawsuit, the Times reported. No emails from Levine’s office specifically were released. These emails, part of his report, suggest that WPATH made decisions influenced by politics rather than science in developing its transgender guidelines. The Times reported that the plaintiffs in the case are attempting to prevent Cantor from testifying. WOMEN UNDER BIDEN ADMINISTRATION’S TITLE IX CHANGES FACE THE ‘EVISCERATION OF LEGAL WOMANHOOD,’ EXPERTS SAY Transgender procedures and treatments for children have become a hot button issue in the country’s culture war. More than a dozen states in the U.S. have enacted bans on surgical procedures and hormonal prescriptions for transgender youth. Idaho, North Dakota, Florida, Oklahoma and Alabama have passed laws making it a felony to perform sex changes on children. Several blue states , meanwhile, have enacted “sanctuary state” laws in recent years shielding medical providers from facing penalties for conducting transgender procedures on adolescents. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Levine’s office did not respond to Fox News Digital’s request for comment by press deadline.
CM Arvind Kejriwal sent to 3-day CBI custody in Delhi liquor policy case
CBI had sought five days of custody of CM Arvind Kejriwal.
What powers does Rahul Gandhi get as Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha?
The Leader of the Opposition is the politician who leads the official Opposition in either House of the Parliament.
Supreme Court rules on challenge to Biden admin’s effort to influence social media
The Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled in favor of the Biden administration in a challenge to its alleged coordination with social media companies, saying that the states who sued the administration lacked standing. The case, Murthy v. Missouri, stems from a lawsuit brought by state attorneys general from Missouri and Louisiana that accused high-ranking government officials of working with giant social media companies “under the guise of combating misinformation” that ultimately led to censoring speech on topics that included Hunter Biden’s laptop, COVID-19 origins and the efficacy of face masks. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority, said the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring their challenge. “The plaintiffs, without any concrete link between their injuries and the defendants’ conduct, ask us to conduct a review of the years-long communications between dozens of federal officials, across different agencies, with different social-media platforms, about different topics.” SUPREME COURT TO HEAR ARGUMENTS IN KEY FIRST AMENDMENT CASE CHALLENGING BIDEN ADMIN TEAMWORK WITH BIG TECH “This Court’s standing doctrine prevents us from “exercis[ing such] general legal oversight” of the other branches of Government. We therefore reverse the judgment of the Fifth Circuit and remand the case for further proceedings consistent with this opinion,” she said. The vote was 6-3, with Justice Samuel Alito dissenting, joined by Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch. This is a breaking news report, check back for updates.
Conservative group rips Biden in blistering Rachel Morin ad before CNN Presidential Debate: ‘Nightmare’
FIRST ON FOX: A conservative nonprofit is releasing a six-figure ad campaign in key swing states on the eve of the first presidential debate on Thursday, hammering President Biden on his “open border” they say has become a “nightmare for American women.” The conservative nonprofit Building America’s Future announced on Wednesday it is running a 60-second digital ad bracketing the CNN Presidential Debate that focuses on the death of Rachel Morin, who was allegedly murdered by an illegal immigrant. The digital ad, called “Again,” which will run in Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, North Carolina, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, will highlight “how an illegal immigrant wanted for murder was let into the U.S. by President Biden and went on to kill Maryland mom, Rachel Morin,” the group said in a press release. “It just keeps happening,” the ad says behind the backdrop of a woman walking along a trail, alluding to how Rachel Morin, 37, was raped and beaten before she was strangled to death on a Maryland hiking trail in August 2023, according to police, leaving her five children without a mother. HOW TO WATCH THE CNN PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE SIMULCAST ON THE FOX NEWS CHANNEL “Laken Riley wasn’t the first and in Joe Biden’s America, sadly, she won’t be the last.” The ad continues, “Illegal immigrant Victor Hernandez. He was wanted for murder, but Biden let him in.” BIDEN’S LATEST BORDER ORDER MAY EMBOLDEN MIGRANTS TO FLOUT IMMIGRATION LAWS, COMMIT MARRIAGE FRAUD The ad also mentions the recent murder of Jocelyn Nungaray, a 12-year-old Houston girl who was allegedly raped and murdered last week by two illegal immigrants. “Joe Biden’s open border, a nightmare for American women,” the ad says. The ad will run from Wednesday, June 26, through Friday, June 28, at a cost of over $200,000. “The media buy also includes mobile billboards and 2D projections on famous buildings displaying portions of the ad in major metro areas of Atlanta, Georgia, Greensboro, North Carolina, and Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,” the group said in a press release. Building America’s Future previously bracketed Biden’s SOTU address with a scathing ad focused on the death of Georgia nursing student Laken Riley, allegedly at the hands of an illegal immigrant, that CNN declined to air during the speech. Fox News Digital reached out to the Biden campaign for comment but did not receive a response. Fox News Digital’s Rebecca Rosenberg contributed to this report
Trump demands Fani Willis’ disqualification over ‘misconduct’ in opening brief to appeals court
Lawyers for former President Trump have filed the opening brief in their appeal of a court order in hopes of disqualifying District Attorney Fani Willis from the sweeping electioneering case against him in Georgia. “The brief persuasively argues that the trial court should have dismissed the case and disqualified DA Willis for her forensic misconduct and the appearance of impropriety between her and former Special Assistant DA Wade, who was her lover and taxpayer-funded financial benefactor,” Steve Sadow, lead attorney for Trump, said in a statement. “We are optimistic that the Court will favorably decide the appeal in our favor.” The Georgia Court of Appeals agreed to hear arguments on Oct. 4 in the appeal by Trump and his co-defendants to have embattled Willis disqualified from the case due to an “improper” affair with former special prosecutor Nathan Wade. FANI WILLIS’ EX-STAFFER TESTIFIES SHE WAS FIRED AFTER BLOWING WHISTLE ON DA’S SPENDING “Should a prosecutor be disqualified for intentionally and repeatedly violating ethical and professional canons to prejudice defendants for personal or political gain? Yes,” the brief argues. “Is disqualification necessary when a prosecutor testifies falsely, conceals misconduct, and creates ‘an odor of mendacity’ that results in a ‘significant appearance of impropriety?’ Undoubtedly so. If this prosecutor deflects attention from her misconduct by claiming on national television that the defendants are dishonest racists for bringing the truthful accusations to light, could anyone have confidence in the impartiality of the prosecutor’s actions? Absolutely not,” it states. The appeals court paused activity in the case against Trump, all but eliminating any opportunity for Willis to try the former president before the election in November. TRUMP’S APPEAL TO DISQUALIFY FANI WILLIS FROM GA CASE GETS OCTOBER HEARING DATE Willis filed a motion to dismiss that appeal earlier this month, saying the lower court found there was no sufficient evidence to support their claims that Willis has a conflict of interest, and says that there is “no basis” to appeal Fulton Superior Court Judge Scott McAfee’s March ruling allowing Willis to stay on the case. Trump’s lawyer called the motion a “last ditch effort to stop any appellate review of [her] misconduct.” Trump was indicted in August along with 18 co-defendants out of the yearslong criminal investigation led by Willis and state prosecutors in Georgia into his alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 presidential election in the state. The charges include violating the Georgia RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act; solicitation of violation of oath by a public officer; conspiracy to commit impersonating a public officer; conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree; conspiracy to commit false statements and writings; conspiracy to commit filing false documents; conspiracy to commit forgery in the first degree; and filing false documents. Since then, Willis has struggled to avoid roadblocks in her efforts to try Trump, the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, before the election. McAfee in March dismissed six of the charges and said the state failed to allege sufficient detail for six counts of “solicitation of violation of oath by public officer.” In February, Michael Roman, a GOP operative and co-defendant in the case, dropped bombshell accusations that Willis had an “improper” affair with Wade, whom she hired to help prosecute the case in November 2021. Other co-defendants made similar allegations, and said she financially benefited from her relationship with him by taking lavish vacations together. Both Wade and Willis denied they were in a romantic relationship prior to his hiring and said the couple would split the costs of their shared travels; Willis said she reimbursed Wade for her share of the trips in cash. After evidentiary hearings held in February, Judge McAfee ordered that Wade had to be removed in order to keep Willis from disqualification in the Trump election interference case. “[T]he established record now highlights a significant appearance of impropriety that infects the current structure of the prosecution team – an appearance that must be removed through the State’s selection of one of two options,” he wrote, adding that Willis and her whole office can choose to step aside, or Wade can withdraw from the case. Wade subsequently resigned from his post as special prosecutor. In his March order, McAfee said while Willis’ “reimbursement practice” was “unusual and the lack of any documentary corroboration understandably concerning,” he ultimately decided that the defendants did not present “sufficient evidence” that expenses weren’t “roughly divided evenly.” He also said “the evidence demonstrated that the financial gain flowing from her relationship with Wade was not a motivating factor on the part of the District Attorney to indict and prosecute this case.” “[T]he Court finds that the record made at the evidentiary hearing established that the District Attorney’s prosecution is encumbered by an appearance of impropriety,” McAfee wrote in his order. GEORGIA PROSECUTOR FANI WILLIS APPEALS AFTER JUDGE DROPS MULTIPLE TRUMP CHARGES “As the case moves forward, reasonable members of the public could easily be left to wonder whether the financial exchanges have continued resulting in some form of benefit to the District Attorney, or even whether the romantic relationship has resumed.” “Put differently, an outsider could reasonably think that the District Attorney is not exercising her independent professional judgment totally free of any compromising influences. As long as Wade remains on the case, this unnecessary perception will persist,” he said. When the defense in March submitted a joint motion for a Certificate of Immediate Review, McAfee said his Order on the Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss and Disqualify the Fulton County District Attorney issued March 15 “is of such importance to the case that immediate review should be had” and allowed the defendants to ask the Georgia appeals court for an opportunity to appeal, which the court granted last month.
Boebert proves MAGA hardliners still have plenty of fight in them with GOP primary win
Rep. Lauren Boebert’s victory in Colorado’s GOP primary suggests voters still have an appetite for aggressive, pro-Trump politicians, despite the drama they sometimes bring. Boebert claimed victory over a field of five other Republican challengers Tuesday night after switching congressional districts, having only narrowly secured a win in 2022. Boebert is among a cast of pro-Trump figures on Capitol Hill who have adopted the former president’s strategy of being constantly on offense and refusing to back down amid scandal. Boebert’s campaign echoed that of former President Trump, with a hard-line stance on illegal immigration and bashing President Biden’s impact on the economy. “Build the wall, deport them all,” was a common refrain at her events. LAUREN BOEBERT HAS SURGERY TO REMOVE BLOOD CLOT, DIAGNOSED WITH RARE CONDITION Boebert is expected to also win the November general election. Her new district sweeps across a wide expanse of ranches, ghost towns and conservative parts of the Denver metro area that make up much of the plains of eastern Colorado. Its voters overwhelmingly backed former President Trump in 2020. BOEBERT RESPONDS TO REPORTS OF FIGHT WITH EX-HUSBAND AT COLORADO RESTAURANT AFTER POLICE CALLED A November victory would see her replace Rep. Ken Buck, R-Colo., who announced his retirement this year. Buck cited the divisiveness of today’s politics and his party’s devotion to Trump in explaining his decision to resign. Like Trump, Boebert has paired her firebrand politics with a scandalous personal life. She sparked controversy and drew national headlines last September after she and a male companion were escorted out of a Denver theater’s production of the “Beetlejuice” musical for causing a disturbance that involved laughing, singing, recording and vaping. Boebert acknowledged the “unwanted attention” she received after her appearance at the venue and insisted that her words and actions that night had not been meant to be “malicious” or to “cause harm.” Her opponents in the primary attempted to use Beobert’s dramatic tenure in Washington as a weapon, suggesting she was too focused on attention from the media. “We’ve seen how Lauren Boebert would represent us,” candidate Deborah Flora, a conservative radio host, said during a debate. “Missing key votes while chasing cameras and being in the center of D.C. drama instead of delivering real solutions for the people.” Boebert urged her voters forward at her victory event Tuesday evening, telling her supporters, “It’s not over.” “President Trump needs us now more than ever to get him in the race, in the fight, in the White House Nov. 5,” she said. “We have a lot of work to do, don’t slow down. Don’t relent.”
New York GOP leader celebrates Bowman’s double-digit defeat to pro-Israel Democrat: ‘Good riddance, Jamaal’
The leader of New York’s Republican Party celebrated the first ouster of a “Squad” member since the progressive coalition’s inception in 2018, after Rep. Jamaal Bowman, D-N.Y., suffered a double-digit primary defeat to Westchester County Executive George Latimer, a pro-Israel moderate Democrat. “Good riddance, Jamaal. Every socialist in Congress and the State Legislature should likewise be rooted out of public office,” New York GOP Chair Ed Cox said in a statement Wednesday. “Jamaal Bowman just faced the consequences of his disgraceful actions. From his childish fire alarm stunt to his blatant anti-Semitic remarks and his latest public meltdown, Bowman has repeatedly shown he is unfit for office.” During his concession speech Tuesday night, Bowman issued an apology for his viral, profanity-laced rally in the Bronx over the weekend, but in doing so, repeated criticism of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the pro-Israel advocacy group that reportedly spent nearly $15 million in an effort to unseat the “Squad” member accused of spewing antisemitic rhetoric. “I want to make an apology, a public apology, for, you know, sometimes using foul language. I’m sorry,” Bowman told a crowd of supporters following his defeat. “But… I think, it is not… how do I want to say this? We should not be well-adjusted to a sick society. We should be outraged. We should be outraged when a super PAC of dark money gets fed $20 million to brainwash people into believing something that isn’t true. We should be outraged about that. We should be outraged when, unfortunately, some so-called Democrats are aligning themselves with radical, racist, right-wing Republicans.” In a post on X, AIPAC, meanwhile, congratulated Latimer “on his resounding victory over an anti-Israel detractor.” “This triumph by a strong pro-Israel candidate represents a major victory for the Democratic mainstream that stands with the Jewish state and a defeat for the extremist fringe,” AIPAC said. HOUSE DEMOCRAT BECOMES THE FIRST SQUAD MEMBER EVER DEFEATED IN A PRIMARY BATTLE “100% of AIPAC-endorsed Democrats have won so far this cycle,” the group added in a separate post. “Being pro-Israel is good policy and good politics!” Bowman’s speech on Tuesday night demonstrated his socialist views and criticism of Israel’s war against Hamas terrorists in Gaza. “We know that it is incumbent upon us, and it is imperative for us to work together in solidarity, in coalition to build a multiracial, multibackground, multiethnic democracy that works for everyone,” he said. We will never stand for the bombing and killing of babies in Gaza. We will never stand for the killing and bombing of children in the Bronx…. We will never stand for Western imperialism in Honduras or Guatemala or here.” “We are a union race that believes the end of the forever wars is possible and necessary,” he added. “We will continue to fight to tax the rich. We know the rich need to pay their fair share. We cannot support corporate tax breaks, and we want and demand universal childcare…. And to continue to fight the evils of capitalism, militarism and racism.” DEMOCRAT CHALLENGER SLAMS BOWMAN’S ‘THEATER OF CONFLICT,’ SAYS PROFANITY-LACED RALLY JEOPARDIZES PARTY ‘UNITY’ Latimer, meanwhile, welcomed his victory with a message of unity. “Tonight we turn a page, and we say that we believe in inclusion of everybody in our representation. That you are included, no matter what your demographic is. Doesn’t matter your age, the color of your skin, your religion, sexual identity, whether you’re a right hander or left hander, whether you’re a Met fan or a Yankee fan,” Latimer joked. “We go to Washington, we’re one of 435. But we’re not the only one. You know, good men and women in Washington who feel the same way we do, and we have to find each other and link with each other. We have to look at arguments of the far right and the far left and say you cannot destroy this country with your rhetoric and your arguments,” he said, garnering cheers from the crowd. “We have to have unity all across that continuum, and if you hold a strong belief, you still must work with other people don’t share that belief because America hangs in the balance.” While Bowman said he wanted to tax the rich, Latimer told his supporters, “I don’t want us to vilify anybody and I see some of that. There are men and women who’ve accomplished things and have resources because of those accomplishments. Let’s make sure that they’re part of what we’re doing instead of being vilified, because we want to have the growth for jobs and for opportunity for everyone.” CLICK HERE TO GET FOX NEWS APP “We have to fight to make sure that we do not vilify each other, and that we remember that we’re all Americans, and that our common future is bound together. And if we think that way, that the problems that we see – they’re serious problems, climate change is a serious problem, we have issues to deal with immigration, serious issues – we’re bound together by a common future,” Latimer said. “So we work on those problems together. We argue, we debate, we find a way to come together. This country cannot afford to splinter into little pieces, and every single representative has to understand the necessity for unity so that we can move forward as a nation.” Fox News’ Tamara Gitt contributed to this report.
Biden campaign targets Trump over ‘neglect of duty’ on eve of CNN Presidential Debate
EXCLUSIVE – President Biden’s re-election campaign is taking aim at former President Trump over his actions during the attack three and a half years ago on the U.S. Capitol, as they launch a new ad on the eve of the first presidential debate. The spot, shared first with Fox News on Wednesday, features Genesee County, MIchigan, Sheriff Chris Swanson discussing how he watched in horror as Trump supporters stormed the Capitol and attacked Capitol police officers on Jan. 6, 2021 as they aimed to disrupt congressional certification of Biden’s 2020 election victory over Trump. The ad includes a clip of Trump at a rally with supporters near the White House ahead of the attack on the Capitol, saying “fight like hell and if you don’t fight like hell, you’re not going to have a country anymore.” Swanson, in the ad, says “it should have been stopped. That’s neglect of duty.” HOW TO WATCH THE CNN PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE SIMULCAST ON THE FOX NEWS CHANNEL “As a sheriff, it’s awful to watch police officers getting attacked. That’s not supporting this badge and this uniform. I have no desire to work with somebody who divides. That’s not what America is,” Swanson emphasizes. Swanson, who has joined several Capitol police officers in pillorying Trump over his actions on Jan. 6, 2021 and travels the country campaigning for Biden, says “I’ll work with anybody who unites. That’s why I’m with President Joe Biden.” TRUMP, BIDEN, AIM TO USE POST-DEBATE RALLIES IN THESE STATES TO PUT THEIR RIVAL ON DEFENSE The Biden campaign said the spot is the latest in their massive $50 million ad blitz running this month in the key battleground states that will likely decide the winner of the 2024 presidential election rematch. The commercial is part of the Biden campaign’s push to hammer the presumptive GOP presidential nominee over what they call “Donald Trump’s Attack on American Democracy.” A release from the Biden campaign said the ad and a news conference they will hold later on Wednesday underscore what they claim is “the stark contrast between Donald Trump’s campaign of revenge and retribution and President Biden’s respect for democracy and law and order.” The Trump campaign fired back after the release of the ad. “The only president neglecting their duty is Joe Biden who is hiding away at Camp David while illegal criminals and terrorists with ISIS ties invade our border and kill innocent Americans. And there is no greater neglect than when Biden left hundreds of Americans behind and 13 brave US Service Members dead in Afghanistan,” Trump campaign national press secretary Karoline Leavitt argued in a statement. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Biden has long made what he charges is Trump’s threats to democracy a key focus of his presidency, and he has hammered home the point as he runs for a second term in the White House. It is very likely Biden will spotlight the issue in Thursday’s first presidential debate between the two major party standard-bearers. The future of American democracy, at 68%, edged out the economy by two points as the most important issue among registered voters in deciding the presidency, according to the latest Fox News national poll. While voters trusted Trump by five points over Biden on handling the economy, the poll indicated voters by a six-point margin said the president would do a better job than his Republican predecessor at protecting democracy. As early as this week, the Supreme Court is expected to rule on whether Trump has immunity from criminal charges he faces over his efforts to overturn his 2020 election defeat. In a separate case, the justices are also expected to release an opinion on whether Trump supporters who attacked the Capitol can be prosecuted for obstructing an official proceeding. Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub.