Texas Republican primary runoffs feature political revenge, Trump as key factors
Two of the most powerful Republicans in Texas are aiming to settle some political scores in Tuesday’s GOP primary runoff elections. And a Republican congressman whose district was the scene of the horrific Uvalde school shooting in 2022 and who’s bucked his party on key issues is fighting for his political life against an opponent backed by far-right members of the House. The showdown grabbing the most headlines is east of Houston, where Texas House Speaker Dade Phelan is facing off against challenger David Covey, who is supported by Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton and former President Trump. Phelan oversaw the effort last year to impeach Paxton over corruption charges. Paxton was acquitted by the state Senate after the House overwhelmingly impeached the controversial attorney general. CONTROVERSIAL MOVE: ABBOTT PARDONS ARMY SERGEANT WHO KILLED BLM PROTESTER In response, Paxton has targeted more than 30 GOP incumbent state representatives, with Phelan at the top of the list. And Paxton’s most powerful ally, Trump, endorsed Covey. Three-term Republican Gov. Greg Abbott is looking for payback over the downing in the state House last year of his education plan that would have opened the spigot for taxpayer funding of private schools. The school voucher measure, which was Abbott’s top legislative item last year, passed the state Senate, but its defeat in the state House was a rare political setback for Abbott. HEAD HERE FOR THE LATEST FOX NEWS 2024 PRIMARY ELECTION RESULTS Nine GOP state House lawmakers went down to defeat in the state’s March primary, with eight more forced into runoffs. All were targeted by either Abbott or Paxton, or by both the governor and the attorney general. “It’s a power play and definitely a battle for the heart and soul of the Republican Party of Texas, and Gov. Abbott wants to get legislators in there who will support his agenda,” veteran Texas-based Republican strategist Brendan Steinhauser told Fox News. “For Ken Paxton and [Lt. Gov.] Dan Patrick and Donald Trump by proxy, for them, it is definitely trying to take out the person who led the impeachment against Ken Paxton and who stood in the way of Dan Patrick’s agenda in the Senate. All those factors together make a really powerful force for the speaker to overcome.” Another legislative runoff that may capture some headlines is in suburban Dallas where former Trump campaign adviser and spokesperson Katrina Pierson – with the backing of both Abbot and Paxton – is aiming to unseat state Rep. Justin Holland. A Republican congressional primary runoff sure to grab national attention is in the southwestern part of the state, where GOP Rep. Tony Gonzales is running for a third two-year term representing a majority Hispanic district that stretches along the U.S.-Mexico border With more than 800 miles of U.S.-Mexico border, Texas’s 23rd district has the largest stretch of the border territory of any congressional district. The district is also home to Uvalde, where two years ago 19 children and two adults were murdered in an elementary school shooting. Gonzales, who has bucked his party on gun safety, immigration and same-sex marriage, is facing off in the runoff against gun rights advocate Brandon Herrera, who’s known for his gun-themed YouTube channel titled “The AK Guy.” While Gonzales is backed by Abbot and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick, Herrera is backed by controversial Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida and other far-right House members. Steinhauser noted that Herrer is branding the showdown as “an establishment-versus-far-right populist race” and that Gonzales “knows that he needs to [protect] his right flank” But he added that “Tony has a pretty big presence in the conservative eco ecosystem. He’s on Fox News a lot, talking about the border.” Get the latest updates from the 2024 campaign trail, exclusive interviews and more at our Fox News Digital election hub.
Dera Sacha Sauda chief Gurmeet Ram Rahim Singh acquitted in Ranjit Singh murder case
In 2021, a special CBI court sentenced Ram Rahim and four others to life imprisonment in the 19-year-old murder case of Ranjit Singh, a former manager of the Dera.
Explained: Clarence Thomas’ split with conservatives to save ‘Elizabeth Warren’s baby’
When the Supreme Court decided last week to keep the controversial Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) funded, some were surprised that Justice Clarence Thomas split from some of his conservative colleagues, writing the majority opinion to keep the CFPB intact. In a 7-2 decision, the court held that Congress uniquely authorized the bureau to draw its funding directly from the Federal Reserve System, therefore allowing it to bypass the usual funding mechanisms laid out in the appropriations clause of the Constitution. The financial watchdog agency bypasses typical congressional appropriations and simply requires the CFPB director to make requests of the Treasury Department for funds as needed. The banking industry parties challenging the CFPB say that is unconstitutional, citing the appropriations clause. But the high court’s majority disagreed. “In this case, we must decide the narrow question whether this funding mechanism complies with the Appropriations Clause. We hold that it does,” the opinion states. SUPREME COURT RULES IN FAVOR OF CFPB, BRAINCHILD OF SEN. ELIZABETH WARREN “For most federal agencies, Congress provides funding on an annual basis. This annual process forces them to regularly implore Congress to fund their operations for the next year. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is different. The Bureau does not have to petition for funds each year. Instead, Congress authorized the Bureau to draw from the Federal Reserve System the amount its Director deems ‘reasonably necessary to carry out’ the Bureau’s duties, subject only to an inflation-adjusted cap,” Thomas explained. “Although there may be other constitutional checks on Congress’ authority to create and fund an administrative agency, specifying the source and purpose is all the control the Appropriations Clause requires.” “The statute that authorizes the Bureau to draw money from the combined earnings of the Federal Reserve System to carry out its duties satisfies the Appropriations Clause,” the opinion states. The banking associations, which sued the CFPB, Thomas writes “offer no defensible argument that the Appropriations Clause requires more than a law that authorizes the disbursement of specified funds for identified purposes.” But Justices Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch strongly dissented, saying, “The Court upholds a novel statutory scheme under which the powerful [CFPB] may bankroll its own agenda without any congressional control or oversight.” Thomas, in the majority opinion, fired back, “The dissent accepts that the question in this case is ultimately about the meaning of ‘Appropriations.’” “It faults us for consulting dictionaries to ascertain the original public meaning of that word, insisting instead that ‘Appropriations’ is a ‘term of art whose meaning has been fleshed out by centuries of history,’” Thomas writes. “But, as we have explained at length, both preratifcation and postratifcation appropriations practice support our source-and-purpose understanding,” he said. The CFPB has been a thorn in the side of Republicans since Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., helped create it after the 2008 market crash in an effort to protect consumers from financial schemes, with authority to regulate banking and lending agencies via federal rules. President Barack Obama said in 2011 that the agency “was Elizabeth’s idea, and through sheer force of will, intelligence, and a bottomless well of energy, she has made, and will continue to make, a profound and positive difference for our country.” LIBERAL JUSTICES EARN PRAISE FOR ‘INDEPENDENCE’ ON SUPREME COURT, BUT THOMAS TRULY STANDS ALONE, EXPERT SAYS Former acting CFPB Director Mick Mulvaney during the Trump administration even called the agency “Elizabeth Warren’s baby.” Warren has been critical of the high court since Trump flipped the ideological majority with his appointments of Justices Amy Coney Barrett, Brett Kavanaugh and Gorsuch. In 2021, she called to expand the court, saying that the current court “threatens the democratic foundations of our nation.” She’s been directly critical of Thomas, accusing him last year of “corruption” by taking vacations paid for by a GOP mega-donor but not disclosing them. Thomas said he consulted his colleagues and the judicial conference and said he’s followed the ethics rules regarding the reporting of those trips. Fox News Digital reached out to Warren for comment. When the high court ruled in the CFPB’s favor last week, she praised it, saying it “followed the law.” Peggy Little, a senior counsel with the New Civil Liberties Alliance (NCLA) disagreed with the majority’s decision. But she thinks Thomas’ authorship “debunks the idea that all conservatives decide the cases the same way.” OVER 100 FORMER CLERKS OF JUSTICE THOMAS SIGN OPEN LETTER DEFENDING HIS INTEGRITY, INDEPENDENCE “I think it’s a healthy corrective to how the media talks about the court,” she told Fox News Digital. She added that “it would be a mistake for Congress to consider [the decision] a license to set up similar regimes” and that the high court “might revisit it and see the error of its ways.” David B. Rivkin Jr., an appellate and constitutional law attorney and former White House and Justice Department counsel, says Thomas “marches to the beat of his own drum.” “The notion that the six conservative justices march in lockstep is absurd,” Rivkin said. “There are distinctive differences not only in how they decide specific cases but in their judicial philosophy. There are numerous permutations of originalism and textualism.” “Justice Thomas does what he thinks is right, follows the text and its original intent when it was written, and doesn’t mind if he’s the only dissenting justice,” John Shu, a constitutional lawyer who worked for both Bush administrations, told Fox News Digital. Shu co-authored the first white paper criticizing the leadership structure and funding mechanism of the CFPB with former White House counsel Ambassador C. Boyden Gray in 2010. “If other justices decide to agree with him, that’s nice, though he’s willing to go it alone,” Shu observed. “Justice Thomas is a true originalist and textualist, as is Justice Alito, and in this case, they interpret the term ‘appropriations’ in different ways, which further proves that the justices do not vote in lockstep as some erroneously claim.” “Neither Justice Alito nor Justice Thomas are results-oriented, meaning that they do not begin with a preferred outcome in mind and
Indiana Republican accuses Dem challenger of abandoning constituents, joining ‘DC political machine’
FIRST ON FOX: A Republican looking to flip a House seat from blue to red in Indiana says his Democratic challenger has abandoned the “hardworking” constituents of his district and aligned himself with “the far left” and the “D.C. political machine” after joining Congress more than three years ago. Randy Niemeyer, the Republican nominee to represent Indiana’s 1st Congressional District in the House, will face off against incumbent Democratic Rep. Frank Mrvan in the state’s general election later this year. “Currently, Frank Mrvan’s voting record is more with the far left than it is with these hardworking, middle-class, conservative-natured people in his district. He doesn’t do a lot that’s representative of that,” Niemeyer told Fox News Digital in an interview. Mrvan’s voting record, according to Niemeyer, proves the votes he takes in Washington do not align with the aspirations of those in the Hoosier State’s 1st District. REPUBLICAN CANDIDATE SELECTED AS GOP SEEKS TO FLIP INDIANA HOUSE SEAT FROM BLUE TO RED “Frank has really aligned himself with the D.C. political machine and become very well ingrained in that and has forgotten that his district is not being represented right now by his votes the way it should be and can be,” he said. Niemeyer also said he rarely sees Mrvan interacting with or listening to his constituents in the district, unless it’s for a public appearance or speaking event. “If there’s a parade or an opportunity to speak somewhere, he always takes advantage of that. If there’s a ribbon cutting for some project that was funded by the infrastructure bill or the Inflation Reduction Act… he shows up to those things, too,” he said of Mrvan. “But I don’t see a lot of him or hear a lot of him just interacting within the community and being places where people are to listen and to learn and to make sure that he’s connected to the grassroots and really to the boots on the ground that pay the taxes and pay the freight for this country.” Mrvan won election to Congress in 2020, defeating his GOP challenger, Mark Leyva, by nearly 53,000 votes. He was re-elected to his post in the 2022 cycle, defeating Jennifer-Ruth Green by a little more than 12,000 votes. Niemeyer previously served for 12 years, 10 as president, on the Cedar Lake Town Council. That experience, along with the lessons he learned from it, is something he often reflects on as he seeks to earn trust and support from voters ahead of the general election. “I think one of the biggest things that we can do in government service comes back to my 16 years in local government, where we’re really connected to the people, and we make sure that the folks that we represent, the work that we do, is truly on their behalf,” he said. Niemeyer, who defeated his Republican challengers in the state’s May 7 primary election, has spent his entire life in Northwest Indiana and has been hauling milk for his family’s trucking business for nearly 30 years. SIX HOUSE SEATS THAT COULD FLIP FROM BLUE TO RED IN 2024, POTENTIALLY GIVING GOP A BIGGER MAJORITY Pointing to his upbringing, his work ethic, and his combined 16 years of local government experience, Niemeyer said he shares “a lot of the same struggles” that those in his district have. “I’ve driven three million miles behind the wheel of a tractor trailer. I run a small business. I’ve lived paycheck to paycheck. The business I run operates on slim to no margins at times. I have college debt that I’m going to be paying for my daughter,” he said. “We’ve got those similar life experiences.” “I still drive a truck,” he added. “I like to give perspective to people that I’m out there working with them. I’m sweating with them. We’re doing the blue-collar work. We’re helping to feed this country and that perspective, I think, separates me from Frank, who has just gone along with the farthest left of his party most of the time.” Though he has family members that have public service experience, Niemeyer said his greatest influence in posing a challenge to Mrvan comes from an individual “who never had her name on a campaign sign anywhere.” “My grandmother was a 35-year cafeteria worker at a local school, and she passed away a year after her retirement from cancer,” recalled Niemeyer, who was 16 years old at the time of her death. “We had over 1,100 people come through the line at multiple wakes that we had for her who told similar stories of how she would take money out of her own purse and put it in the cash register so a kid would have a hot meal that might not have a hot meal at home.” “Those people told me these stories, and it really inspired, for me, a real knowledge of what true public service meant,” he added. Niemeyer will face off against Mrvan, as well as three independent candidates, in the Nov. 5 general election.
NY v. Trump: Closing arguments to begin as Merchan skirts decision on motion to dismiss
Judge Juan Merchan is expected to bring jurors back into court Tuesday morning to hear closing arguments in New York v. Trump from Manhattan prosecutors and defense attorneys for former President Trump in his unprecedented criminal trial. The jury has been away from the courtroom for a week, after the evidentiary portion of the trial concluded last Tuesday. Due to scheduling conflicts and the Memorial Day holiday, the jury will return at 9:30 a.m. Tuesday to hear summations of the case from prosecutors and defense attorneys before deliberating on a verdict. The Manhattan case, brought by District Attorney Alvin Bragg against Trump turned testy last Monday when defense attorneys made a second attempt to dismiss the case, saying no evidence had been presented by the prosecution to connect the former president to any falsification of business records. Merchan still has not announced his decision on the matter. STEFANIK FILES ETHICS COMPLAINT AGAINST TRUMP TRIAL JUDGE, CITES DAUGHTER’S WORK FOR GROUP PROMOTING DEMS Prosecutors needed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Trump falsified records to conceal a $130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels, a pornographic performer, in the lead-up to the 2016 election to silence her about an alleged affair with Trump in 2006. The former president has maintained his innocence. Merchan said he expects closing arguments will take the entire day Tuesday, and has asked jurors if they are able to stay late. It is possible closing arguments continue into Wednesday. Merchan plans to charge the jury on Wednesday, and estimated his instructions for jurors will take approximately an hour. Merchan will then send jurors to deliberate. Trump will be required to remain at the courthouse during deliberations, in case there is a note from the jury. The former president needs to be present for the reading of any jury notes. NY V. TRUMP: HOUSE GOP LAWMAKER URGES MERCHAN TO DISMISS CASE OVER ‘FATAL FLAWS,’ REFER TO FEC Defense attorneys motioned for dismissal after Michael Cohen, Trump’s former attorney and the prosecution’s “star witness,” finished his testimony. Cohen testified that he personally made the $130,000 payment to Daniels using a home equity line of credit in an effort to conceal the payment from his wife. Cohen said he did this because Trump told him to “handle it” in order to prevent a negative story from coming out ahead of the election. But Trump’s defense attorneys maintained that the president never directed Cohen to make the payment. Cohen testified that he was “reimbursed $420,000” for the $130,000 he paid to Daniels. Cohen said former Trump Organization CFO Allen Weisselberg suggested he “gross up” the payments and that Trump knew the details of the reimbursement. The prosecution presented Cohen with 11 checks totaling $420,000. Cohen confirmed that they were all received and deposited. The checks had a description of a “retainer,” which Cohen said was false. But Trump defense attorney Todd Blanche asked for an immediate order of dismissal, saying there is “no evidence” that the filings or business records at the center of the case were false, that there are “absolutely no false business filings.” Blanche said there is no dispute that Cohen acted as a personal attorney for Trump in 2017 and that there is no evidence or intent by Trump to mislead, hide or falsify business records. Blanche said there would be records of intent to defraud, if they existed, and that there were no other crimes being covered up. He said there was no evidence of anyone thinking of a campaign finance charge when the payment was made to Daniels or when Cohen and Weisselberg developed the repayment plan. Blanche said Trump paid Cohen a $35,000 “monthly retainer,” which is what the records state, and said there is no evidence from any witness to prove any criminal intent. Reflecting on the prosecution’s case, Blanche pointed to the alleged “catch and kill” strategy used to prevent a “demonstrably false” story a Trump Tower doorman had about Trump from being published. NY V. TRUMP: DEFENSE RESTS WITHOUT CALLING FORMER PRESIDENT TO TESTIFY; MOTION TO DISMISS PENDING “How on Earth is keeping a false story from voters criminal?” Blanche asked, adding it was “not a catch and kill and certainly not a criminal catch and kill.” “There is no way the court should let this case go to the jury with Mr. Cohen’s testimony,” Blanche said, adding that Cohen has lied under oath in the past and during the current criminal trial in Merchan’s courtroom. Merchan asked Blanche if he should “find Mr. Cohen not credible by a matter of law,” to which Blanche said “yes.” EX-TOP BIDEN DOJ OFFICIAL NOW PROSECUTING TRUMP WAS ONCE PAID BY DNC FOR ‘POLITICAL CONSULTING’ “So, you want me to take it out of the jury’s hands?” Merchan asked, with Blanche responding that Cohen’s entire testimony should not be considered by the jury. Merchan told Blanche that if Cohen’s “lies” were “irrefutable,” then he would be able to convince the jury of that. The prosecution then argued that under the New York state falsifying business records statute, anyone “causing” the falsified records can be punished. “As a matter of law, it is sufficient, more than sufficient, that the defendant set in motion the sequence of events leading to the falsification of business records,” prosecutor Matthew Colangelo argued. Trump spoke to reporters last Tuesday outside the courtroom, saying his defense team has already essentially “won” the case. Trump said Merchan should side “decisively” against Bragg. “Any other judge would have thrown this case out,” Trump said.
Watch Video: Fire breaks out at Rajiv Chowk Metro station in Delhi, DMRC issues statement
“The affected pantograph was immediately put out of service and the train continued its onward journey as usual after around 5 minutes of troubleshooting with the remaining pantographs of the train,” DMRC said.
Mizoram: 10 dead, several missing as stone quarry collapses in Aizawl amid rains
Ten people died and several others were missing as a stone quarry collapsed in Mizoram’s Aizawl district on Tuesday morning amid incessant rains as an impact of cyclone Remal, police said. The incident happened around 6 am in an area between Melthum and Hlimen on the southern outskirts of the Aizawl town, they said.
Bomb threat on Delhi-Varanasi IndiGo flight, all passengers safe
The aircraft was promptly moved to an isolation bay for thorough security inspection.
Nadal defeated by Zverev in likely French Open farewell
Rafael Nadal, 22-time Grand Slam champion, lost in straight sets to Alexander Zverev in his probable last match at Roland Garros. Rafael Nadal’s record-breaking French Open career came to its likely end when the 14-time champion slumped to a demoralising first-round defeat against Alexander Zverev. Nadal, who turns 38 on June 3, went down 6-3, 7-6 (7/5), 6-3 to world number four Zverev on Monday, suffering only his fourth loss in 116 matches at Roland Garros since his 2005 title-winning debut. It was the first time he had been defeated in Paris in the opening round and will again lead to questions over his long-term future in tennis. “I don’t know if this is the last time I will be here, I am not 100 percent sure but if it is then I wanted to enjoy it,” said Nadal. “The feelings today are difficult to describe in words.” Plagued by injuries, which had limited him to just four events since January last year, former world number one Nadal is now 275 in the rankings and was unseeded in Paris. However, he insisted on the eve of the tournament that he was “100 percent keeping the door open” on his future in a sport which has brought him 22 Grand Slam titles. In a repeat of the 2022 semifinal, which Nadal won when Zverev quit with ankle ligament damage, the Spaniard had his chances. Nadal was a break of serve up in the second and third sets, only to have his serve broken on both occasions by his in-form 27-year-old opponent. Chants of “Rafa, Rafa” had loudly echoed under the roof of Court Philippe Chatrier, which was shut tight against the torrential rain sweeping across the grounds and bringing havoc to the schedule. They subsided to silence when Nadal was broken to love in his opening service game and he was left to regret his inability to convert two break points in the fourth game. Nadal saved two set points in the ninth game, but surrendered the opener after 50 minutes when he buried a loose forehand into the net. It was only the fourth opening set he had lost at Roland Garros. Nadal broke for the first time in the match to lead 3-2 in the second set, but couldn’t back up the advantage and handed the break back to three-time semifinalist Zverev as he served for the set. A tense tie-breaker followed which the German claimed, buoyed by stretching to 5/3 on the back of a gruelling 19-shot rally. Nadal dug deep and with the likes of Novak Djokovic, Carlos Alcaraz and Iga Swiatek having watched from the packed stands, he broke and held for 2-0 in the third set. However, Zverev again roared back to level at 2-2 before a besieged Nadal had to save four break points in a 13-minute fifth game to stay in contention. The effort was too much and a composed Zverev was soon 4-3 up and the match was over when Nadal fired a forehand wide and long. Adblock test (Why?)
Bill Walton, NBA champion and beloved broadcaster, dies aged 71
Tributes pour in for Walton, a two-time NBA champion and basketball Hall of Famer remembered as ‘truly one of a kind’. Bill Walton, a two-time National Basketball Association (NBA) champion, Hall of Fame player and beloved broadcaster, has died at the age of 71, the league says. The NBA said Walton passed away on Monday after a prolonged battle with cancer. “Bill Walton was truly one of a kind,” NBA Commissioner Adam Silver said in a statement. Walton, a 6-foot-11 (211cm) centre who moved gracefully despite his height, rose to stardom in college where he was part of the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), dynasty under coach John Wooden. He won National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) championships in 1972 and 1973 before establishing himself as a force early in his professional career. Walton led the Portland Trail Blazers to the championship in 1977, and he was named the NBA’s Most Valuable Player the following year. The Denver Nuggets’ Dan Issel, left, guards Portland Trail Blazers’ Bill Walton as Walton moves towards the basket during a game in 1978 [File: Jack Smith/AP Photo] His most famous performance was the 1973 NCAA title game – UCLA against Memphis – in which he shot an incredible 21-for-22 from the field and led the Bruins to another national championship. But Walton’s NBA career – disrupted by chronic foot injuries – lasted only 468 games with Portland, then San Diego and eventually the Los Angeles Clippers, and the Boston Celtics. He averaged 13.3 points and 10.5 rebounds in those games, neither of those numbers exactly record-setting. Still, his impact on the game was massive. “As a Hall of Fame player, he redefined the centre position. His unique all-around skills made him a dominant force at UCLA and led to an NBA regular-season and Finals MVP, two NBA championships and a spot on the NBA’s 50th and 75th Anniversary Teams,” Silver said on Monday. When Walton retired from the NBA, he turned to broadcasting, something he never thought he could be good at or would be possible for him because he had a pronounced stutter at times in his life. But he excelled, winning an Emmy award and eventually being named one of the top 50 sports broadcasters of all time by the American Sportscasters Association. Rest in peace to a friend, 2X NBA Champion, Hall of Famer, and one of the most skilled centers we’ve ever seen Bill Walton! His NCAA Championship performance as a UCLA Bruin against Memphis is by far the most dominate NCAA Championship performance ever – he shot 21 for 22 and had… — Earvin Magic Johnson (@MagicJohnson) May 27, 2024 And Walton, who was enshrined in the Hall of Fame in 1993, was larger than life, both on and off the court. He “delivered insightful and colourful commentary which entertained generations of basketball fans”, Silver said on Monday. “But what I will remember most about him was his zest for life. “He was a regular presence at league events – always upbeat, smiling ear to ear and looking to share his wisdom and warmth.” Tributes also rolled in for Walton from some of the biggest names in basketball, including Earvin “Magic” Johnson, who described Walton as “one of the most skilled centers we’ve ever seen”. “They talk about [Denver Nuggets star Nikola] Jokic being the most skilled center but Bill Walton was first! From shooting jump shots to making incredible passes, he was one of the smartest basketball players to ever live,” Johnson wrote on X. “Bill was a great ambassador for college basketball and the NBA, and he will be sorely missed.” Julius “Dr J” Erving also paid tribute to Walton and offered condolences to his family. “Bill Walton enjoyed life in every way. To compete against him & to work with him was a blessing in my life,” Erving said in a social media post. I am sad today hearing that my comrade & one of the sports worlds most beloved champions & characters has passed. Bill Walton enjoyed life in every way. To compete against him & to work with him was a blessing in my life. Sorry for your loss Walton family. We’ll miss him too. Doc pic.twitter.com/GAEt1DRH8N — Julius Dr J Erving (@JuliusErving) May 27, 2024 Adblock test (Why?)