Author:

What to know about the 2024 Nevada Republican caucus and primary

The next showdown in the Republican nominating fight between Donald Trump and Nikki Haley takes place in Nevada this week. But because of legal disputes and political maneuverings, there are actually two contests. Haley, Trump’s last remaining rival for the Republican presidential nomination, is on one ballot on Tuesday, while Trump is on a different one on Thursday. TRUMP DELIVERS UNIFYING MESSAGE AFTER LANDSLIDE CAUCUS VICTORY, RECEIVES BIPARTISAN PRAISE Trump, the former Republican president, has almost clinched the nomination after victories in nominating contests in Iowa and New Hampshire. Haley, a former U.N. ambassador who has no clear path to the nomination, has vowed to stay in the race and is aiming to make a potential last stand in her home state of South Carolina on Feb. 24. Here are some key facts about why the Nevada race is such an anomaly this year: The first contest is a state-run primary on Feb. 6. Haley is on that ballot. The second vote is a caucus on Feb. 8, organized by the Trump-friendly Nevada Republican Party, with just Trump on that ballot. Even if Haley wins the primary on Feb. 6, it will be an empty victory, as only candidates competing in the party-run caucus on Feb. 8 can compete for the state’s 26 delegates. That means Trump is almost certainly assured to win all of Nevada’s 26 delegates on Feb. 8. There is a backstory as to why many of the Western state’s voters find themselves receiving two ballots in the mail, with Trump on only one of them, and Haley on the other. The competing ballots are the result of a conflict between the state Republican Party – run by Trump allies – and a 2021 state law that mandates a primary must be held. Nevada has long held caucuses to chose presidential candidates, but after reporting issues and other problems with the 2020 caucuses, the state legislature passed a law switching its voting system to a more straightforward, traditional primary vote. The law was also aimed at making Nevada a more attractive option as it sought to move higher up the nominating calendar pecking order. Initially, the move appeared to be a success: for 2024, by setting a primary date of Feb. 6, the state captured the coveted spot of being third in the nation to vote. But presidential nominating caucuses are run by state political parties, not the state, and the Trump-friendly Nevada Republican Party decided to stick with a caucus on Feb. 8. Party leaders viewed a caucus as helping Trump, because of his superior ground game in the state. They also ruled last year that any candidate participating in the primary on Feb. 6 would be barred from participating in the caucus, and thus could not compete for any of the state’s 26 delegates. On one level, Nevada got what it wanted: third in line in the nominating process. But on another, it’s an empty prize: Haley is not campaigning there, Trump has made only one recent visit, and the national media are all but ignoring a contest the state Republican Party sewed up in Trump’s favor months ago.

Indiana Republican Rep. Victoria Spartz to run for re-election, reversing 2023 decision

Rep. Victoria Spartz, R-Ind., announced she will run for re-election this year, reversing the retirement announcement she made in 2023. Spartz had said in February of last year that she would not seek re-election and planned to spend more time with her family. The two-term lawmaker explained her decision in a Monday statement. “Looking where we are today, and urged by many of my constituents, I do not believe I would be able to deliver this Congress, with the current failed leadership in Washington, D.C., on the important issues for our nation that I have worked very hard on,” Spartz said. “As someone who grew up under tyranny, I understand the significance of these challenging times for our Republic, and if my fellow Hoosiers and God decide, I will be honored to continue fighting for them,” Spartz said in her statement. LARGE MAJORITY OF ILLEGAL BORDER CROSSINGS SHIFT TO ARIZONA AND CALIFORNIA, PIVOTING AWAY FROM TEXAS The announcement puts a damper on campaign plans of the nine Republicans who have filed to run for her seat. Spartz is barely meeting Indiana’s filing deadline, which requires candidates to submit paperwork by Friday. SOUTH DAKOTA GOV NOEM SEEKS TO BOLSTER TEXAS SECURITY EFFORTS AT US-MEXICO BORDER No Democrats had filed to contest the seat. Despite the announcement, three other GOP-held Indiana seats will be changing hands come Election Day. Both Reps. Larry Bucshon and Greg Pence announced last month they would not be running for re-election. ‘TAKE BACK OUR BORDER’ CONVOY ARRIVES IN TEXAS: ‘WE WANT OUR NATION SAVED’ Rep. Jim Banks also announced he would not seek to keep his seat, running instead to replace Indiana Sen. Mike Braun. The Associated Press contributed to this report

Robinson, Pelosi and the sham of Western progressive politics

Politicians love to talk. It’s a big part of the job. You talk in legislatures. You talk at committees. You talk to voters. You talk to reporters. If you’re lucky, you’re asked to talk on TV, the radio, or other popular platforms. Politicians crave the attention. It’s validating. It means that you’re important. You’re a somebody with important things to say. You’re noticed. People listen. Politicians know that the bigger their job, the more careful they have to be when they’re talking to an audience – however small or large. That’s especially true if you’re a cabinet minister or a “leader”. Too much unscripted talking can be dangerous. So, more often than not, what politicians say while they’re talking is forgettable or worse, meaningless. They have to stick to their talking points. They adore cliché. Still, there are moments when politicians get too comfortable. They get complacent. They slip up and say something candid and revealing about who they are and what they actually think and believe. Fortunately, two politicians opted for refreshing bursts of honesty over the standard rhetorical gruel this past week. One is Canadian. The other is American. You probably don’t know the first politician. The second is quite well-known. Both were talking, in a roundabout way, about what is happening in Gaza. The first politician’s name is Selina Robinson. She is, as of this writing, the minister of post-secondary education in the “socialist” provincial government of British Columbia, Canada. On January 30, Robinson was talking on Zoom as part of a panel of Jewish politicians organised by a pro-Israeli advocacy group. She was among “friends”, talking to and with “friends”. In one remarkable swoop, Robinson not only rewrote history, but trafficked in a familiar racist trope. Before the engineered birth of Israel, she said, Palestine was “a crappy piece of land with nothing on it”. “There were several hundred thousand people but other than that, it didn’t produce an economy … it couldn’t grow things. It didn’t have anything on it, and that it was the folks who were displaced that came and the people who had been living there for generations and together they worked hard,” the minister said. Translation: 700,000 idle Muslim and Christian Palestinians had, for generations, squandered the chance to make the desert bloom. Happily, it flowered after the arrival of “displaced”, hard-working Israelis who “were offered” the “crappy piece of land”. Since she said what she said, Robinson has stopped talking – in public, at least. Instead, the minister has had to watch and listen to a lot of other people talking about how and why she must resign. Even the pro-Israeli outfit that invited Robinson to talk has more or less abandoned her, reportedly telling a CBC reporter that: “The comments made by Minister Robinson … do not reflect the opinion of our organization.” You know you have talked too much when your once-close “friends” cut you adrift. So, Robinson did what politicians have to do when they give fulsome voice to what they think and believe: she made a grovelling apology on X. Robinson wrote that her “flippant” and “disrespectful” comments had “caused pain”. “I regret what I said and I apologize without reservation.” Few are convinced by Robinson’s belated, performative act of contrition, including two of her “socialist” colleagues in Ottawa. One member of parliament (MP) is demanding a “reassessment” of her place in cabinet. Another MP pilloried Robinson for “an appalling disregard for the horrific violence being inflicted on Palestinians”. Robinson’s boss, the premier of British Columbia, is also talking. He said that the minister’s remarks were “wrong”. Rather than fire her, the premier is giving Robinson a good talking to. He told her, in effect, to keep talking. “She’s got some work to do to go out to the community to address the harm that her comments have caused,” he said. In other curious words, the premier wants Robinson to talk her and the government’s way out of a prickly jam. Right. That should do it. The second chatty politician is the former speaker of the US House of Representatives and the grande dame of Congressional Democrats, Nancy Pelosi. She did her troublesome talking in the ever-agreeable studios of CNN’s Washington bureau on January 29. The influential “Speaker Emerita” was asked to comment on those pesky, mostly young demonstrators who have been interrupting President Joe Biden with chants of “Genocide Joe” at campaign stops and address whether she was “concerned that they might just stay home” in the fast approaching presidential election. A condescending Pelosi promptly played the victim card, saying: “I have been the recipient of, shall we say, their exuberance in this regard … they’re in front of my house all the time.” Poor, pampered Pelosi. The “Speaker Emerita” compounded her, shall we say, disdain with a lecture, claiming that unlike the “exuberant” rabble, she and other serious types on Capitol Hill were required to “think” about “how to try to stop the suffering in Gaza”. Poor, misunderstood Pelosi. Apparently, she “thinks” that a “ceasefire” would not “stop the suffering in Gaza” since that’s what Russian President Vladimir Putin “would like to see”. Pelosi’s McCarthyite-smear-laden logic is loathsome and bizarre. What, apart from a ceasefire, is going to “stop the suffering in Gaza” – with or without Putin’s blessing? Silly, exuberant me, but I can’t “think” of anything other than a “ceasefire” that will “stop the suffering in Gaza”. Pelosi ought to have stopped talking. Thankfully, she didn’t. She then proved that behind every America-flag-pin-wearing speaker emerita, there lies an Alex Jones-like conspiracy theorist who is convinced that the homeland is awash with fifth columnists disguised as citizens exercising their constitutional rights to challenge a sitting president. “I think some of these protestors are spontaneous and organic and sincere,” Pelosi said. “Some, I think, are connected to Russia.” Again, Pelosi ought to have stopped talking. Thankfully, she didn’t. Not done tarring millions of her fellow, albeit “exuberant”, Americans of Arab, Muslim, and Palestinian

Hungary’s ruling party boycotts parliament session on Sweden’s NATO bid

Hungary is the only NATO member yet to approve Sweden’s accession to the military alliance. Lawmakers from Hungary’s ruling party have boycotted an emergency parliament session in which a vote on Sweden’s bid to join NATO was on the agenda. At Monday’s session, which was supported by six opposition parties, Fidesz lawmakers didn’t attend, scuttling the attempt to place a vote on the National Assembly’s schedule. Turkey’s parliament voted to approve Sweden’s accession in January, making Hungary the last of the world’s largest military alliance’s 31 members not to do so. Sweden had pursued a policy of military non-alignment since the Cold War. However, Russia’s full-scale invasion of its neighbour Ukraine in 2022 caused upheaval in geopolitical calculations, and Stockholm applied to become a NATO member that same year. Hungary has maintained close ties with Russia since its invasion of Ukraine, and while it has said it supports the Swedish bid in principle, Budapest has been dragging its feet for months. Prime Minister Viktor Orban told NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg last month that he would urge his Fidesz party to ratify the bid “at the first possible opportunity”. On Friday, the United States embassy reminded Orban in a statement that he promised to act “at the first opportunity” and “Monday’s session provides him with one”. Several ambassadors from NATO member countries attended Monday’s proceedings, including US Ambassador David Pressman. In brief comments to the media after the session, Pressman said the US looks forward to “watching this closely and to Hungary acting expeditiously”. “Sweden’s NATO accession is an issue that directly affects the United States’s national security and affects the security of our alliance as a whole,” he said, reminding Orban of his pledge. Orban is delaying the vote due to his “personal vanity”, Agnes Vadai from the biggest opposition party told the Agence France-Presse news agency. She accused the prime minister of seeking to “make headlines in the international press while making a gesture to Russian President Vladimir Putin by undermining the unity of NATO and the EU”. In a separate statement, US senator Ben Cardin, a Maryland Democrat and chairperson of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, raised the prospect of imposing sanctions on Hungary for its conduct and called Orban “the least reliable member of NATO”. Hungarian officials have indicated that Fidesz lawmakers won’t support holding a vote on Sweden’s NATO bid until Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson accepts an invitation by Orban to visit Budapest to negotiate the matter. Kristersson said he will make the trip but only after Hungary approves his country’s NATO membership. Fidesz said in a statement on Monday that ratification of Sweden’s NATO accession can take place during a regular session of parliament, “but we are expecting the Swedish prime minister to visit Hungary first.” “If this is an important issue for the Swedes, the Swedish prime minister will obviously come to Budapest,” the party said. Hungary’s National Assembly is scheduled to reconvene on February 26, and ratification could take place quickly once it has received Orban’s approval. [embedded content] Adblock test (Why?)

Red Bull investigate allegations against F1 team boss Christian Horner

The Formula One team is investigating a complaint of ‘inappropriate behaviour’ against its team principal. Red Bull are investigating a complaint of alleged “inappropriate behaviour” against their Formula One team boss, Christian Horner, the Austrian energy drink company says in a statement without giving any details about the allegations. The Briton presided over the most dominant season in Formula One history last year with Max Verstappen taking his third title in a row and the team winning 21 of 22 races. “After being made aware of certain recent allegations, the company launched an independent investigation,” Red Bull said on Monday. “This process, which is already under way, is being carried out by an external specialist barrister. The company takes these matters extremely seriously and the investigation will be completed as soon as practically possible. “It would not be appropriate to comment further at this time.” The Times newspaper reported Horner, 50, had been accused of inappropriate behaviour by a female colleague, who complained to the team’s parent company. There was no comment from the team, but Horner, who is married to former Spice Girls singer Geri Halliwell, told the Dutch newspaper De Telegraaf that he denies the allegations. Horner has overseen seven drivers world championships and six constructors titles. Red Bull are due to launch their latest car on February 15 ahead of the new season, which starts in Bahrain on March 2. Christian Horner with his wife, former Spice Girls singer Geri Halliwell, at the United States Grand Prix in Austin, Texas [File: Brian Snyder/Reuters] Adblock test (Why?)

Another dead whale beaches in Maryland amid rapid offshore wind development

Maryland state officials discovered a deceased whale off the state’s Atlantic coast last week, marking the second beached whale carcass discovered in the area in three weeks. Officers with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources’ (DNR) Natural Resources Police discovered the carcass of an adult male humpback whale on the north end of Assateague Island National Seashore on Wednesday, the DNR confirmed to Fox News Digital. National Park Service staff moved the carcass, and on Friday, a necropsy was conducted by the DNR Stranding Response Program and National Aquarium. “A definitive cause of death was unable to be determined during the examination and samples are being shipped for diagnostic analysis,” DNR spokesperson Gregg Bortz told Fox News Digital on Monday. Meanwhile, on Jan. 16, another humpback whale was discovered beached in the same location, on Assateague Island National Seashore. The National Park Service said there were “no obvious signs to the cause of death.” MAJOR WIND PROJECT WAS DEPENDENT ON BIDEN ADMIN WAIVING TAXPAYER SAFEGUARD: INTERNAL DOCS However, the string of whale deaths comes as developers race to construct Maryland’s first offshore wind projects. Baltimore wind energy firm US Wind is developing two projects, the 300-megawatt MarWin project and the 800-megawatt Momentum Wind project, which are slated to begin generating electricity in 2025 and 2026, respectively.  Those two projects will be constructed 20 miles off the coast of Maryland on an Atlantic Ocean site located just northeast of Assateague Island National Seashore. ENERGY DEVELOPER DELIVERS MAJOR BLOW TO BLUE STATE’S CLIMATE AGENDA BY CANCELING OFFSHORE WIND CONTRACTS “In response to the news of another whale death on Assateague Island, I am calling for a transparent release of the necropsy results to determine if offshore wind and sonar activity contributed to the cause of death,” Rep. Andy Harris, R-Md., told Fox News Digital in a statement. Over the last 12 months, Harris, who represents Maryland’s Atlantic coastline communities, and other House lawmakers representing coastline communities in Maine, New Jersey and New York, have taken aim at the green energy industry in response to rising whale deaths. They have called for a pause on offshore wind development until it could be ruled out as a cause of the deaths. Last month, Harris hosted a public hearing, during which experts testified about the dangers wind development poses for marine wildlife and called for an end to offshore industrialization in Maryland. Additionally, the Government Accountability Office, the nonpartisan agency tasked with conducting oversight of government operations, said it would investigate the impacts of offshore wind development after Rep. Chris Smith, R-N.J., requested a probe into the matter. TOP OFFICIALS WARNED BIDEN ADMIN ABOUT DANGERS WIND ENERGY PROJECTS POSE TO FISHING INDUSTRY, LETTER SHOWS “This aggressive, independent investigation into the ocean-altering impacts of the 3,400 offshore wind turbines slated for the Jersey Shore will help address the wide-ranging questions and concerns that the Biden Administration and Governor [Phil] Murphy continue to dismiss as they plow full steam ahead with this unprecedented offshore wind industrialization of our shore,” Smith said at the time. “It is absolutely critical that New Jersey residents understand all the impacts of these offshore wind projects — which will permanently transform our marine environment and seascape and could put our tourism-drive economy at grave risk — before it’s too late,” Smith continued. However, federal officials with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration downplayed concerns over wind development causing whale deaths, reiterating that an unusual mortality event along the East Coast had been declared for both the humpback whale and Atlantic right whale species years ago.  In 2023, 37 humpback whales were discovered dead along the East Coast, the highest annual number reported since the mortality event was declared in 2017, according to federal data. 

5 key details in controversial Senate border deal

The long-awaited $118 billion supplemental spending deal, which includes funding for Ukraine, Israel and measures to stem the historic crisis at the southern border, was released late Sunday by Senate lawmakers ahead of an expected vote in the upper chamber later this week. The package has the backing of Senate leaders and the Biden administration, who have said the funding is for the two U.S. allies ($60 billion for Ukraine and $14 billion for Israel) coupled with a bipartisan agreement that will provide approximately $20 billion to control illegal immigration at the southern border, where numbers hit a record 2.4 million encounters in FY 23. “The bipartisan agreement in the Senate is tough, fair, and takes meaningful steps to address the challenges our country faces after decades of Congressional inaction,” Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas said in a statement. GOP SENATORS DEMAND ‘ADEQUATE TIME’ TO REVIEW BORDER SECURITY BILL But it faces significant opposition from Republicans and other conservatives, who say it does not do enough to tackle the border crisis and stop releases into the interior. Some liberal Democrats have also objected to the bill, arguing that it will hurt migrants seeking asylum. Here are the main parts of the immigration deal: At the heart of the deal is a new three-year authority, similar in some ways to the COVID-era Title 42, which allows officials to shut down entries into the U.S. at the southern border. This authority comes into play when there is a rolling seven-day average of 5,000 encounters a day, or 8,500 encounters in a single day. At that point, DHS is mandated to expel all migrants without processing them, with the exception of unaccompanied children. That authority can only end when encounters drop at least 25% for seven days, and DHS has 14 days to end the authority. However, the president can suspend the authority for up to 45 days, and by the third calendar year, the DHS secretary is limited to using it for half the calendar year. DHS can also implement the authority at its discretion when the average number of encounters exceeds 4,000 a day. MIGRANT CRISIS BROKE NEW RECORD IN DECEMBER WITH 302K ENCOUNTERS, OFFICIALS CONFIRM For those who are processed, single adults are still removed, family units are released into the U.S., and asylum cases are fast-tracked through U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. ICE detention is also increased to approximately 50,000 from the current 34,000. The bill expedites two-year work permits for those who are released into the interior, meaning they can work immediately rather than wait for months to receive their permit as is the case now. It’s a demand that has been made for months by Democratic mayors in cities like New York and Chicago, where they have seen enormous numbers of migrants. Those permits would be revoked if the migrant is denied asylum. The bill also includes legal requirements that migrants always be provided with information about their rights, including their right to access counsel. Children will also receive government-funded legal counsel.  The bill tightens the language for the initial “credible fear” screening faced by migrants who claim asylum as they are being removed via expedited removal – a practice that is expected to expand as part of the bill. Migrants will now be expected to prove “reasonable possibility” of persecution if returned to their home country, rather than “significant possibility.” It also moves consideration of bars to asylum, including a criminal conviction, into the initial screening stage rather than later in the process. It also creates a new eligibility bar known as “internal relocation,” which means asylum can be denied if a migrant could have sought safety in their home country instead of fleeing to the U.S. Asylum is now expedited, with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) officials being granted the authority in statute to grant asylum rather than immigration judges. It’s similar to an asylum rule the Biden administration put into place last year and is expected to reduce the process from years to months. It would also end the use of humanitarian parole to release migrants into the U.S. at the border, including the use of the CBP One app for such purposes. The bill includes billions in funding for additional staff and infrastructure at the border, including 1,500 new Customs and Border Protection (CBP) personnel, over 4,300 new asylum officers,1,200 new Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) personnel, and 100 new immigration judge teams. It also includes $1.4 billion in FEMA funding for non-governmental organizations and cities to help settle migrants and $650 million to build and reinforce the border wall. It will also provide $450 million to countries to help them remove and integrate illegal immigrants back into their countries. Also provided will be funding for 100 inspection machines to detect fentanyl, accompanied by new laws to prevent fentanyl trafficking into the U.S. Separate from the border, the bill includes work permits and temporary visas for 250,000 “documented dreamers” – children of immigrants on temporary work visas who have since become adults. The bill also raises the cap on the number of green cards by 50,000 a year, the majority of which will be family-based. It also establishes an expedited pathway for Afghans who were evacuated to the U.S. to get green cards. Fox News’ Bill Melugin and Aishah Hasnie contributed to this report.

Tour of Gaza hospital reveals destruction left by Israeli forces

NewsFeed Rubble and sarcastic graffiti are what Israeli forces have left behind at Gaza’s destroyed Sheikh Hamad Hospital. Published On 5 Feb 20245 Feb 2024 Adblock test (Why?)

Arrests and tear gas at protests against Senegal election delay

NewsFeed Police have cracked down on hundreds of demonstrators in Senegal who came out to protest President Macky Sall’s decision to indefinitely postpone elections. At least two opposition politicians have been arrested. Published On 5 Feb 20245 Feb 2024 Adblock test (Why?)

Schumer-aligned group that meddled in GOP primary hit with complaint alleging FEC violations

FIRST ON FOX: A group aligned with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has been hit with a complaint alleging they have violated Federal Election Commission (FEC) rules.  The mysterious entity, called the Last Best Place PAC, recently jumped into the Montana Senate race and began spending millions to target former Navy SEAL Tim Sheehy ahead of the state’s Republican primary.  The Last Best Place PAC is financially driven by Majority Forward, a dark money nonprofit that has put hundreds of thousands toward the Schumer-aligned Senate Majority PAC for salaries, insurance and IT security. Federal records filed last week show Majority Forward funneled $2.14 million to the Last Best Place PAC and was its only funder. Meanwhile, the group did not file a single independent expenditure report showing those actions, as required by FEC rules, and is now facing a complaint from Americans for Public Trust (APT) over the matter. SCHUMER-ALIGNED GROUP PULLED IN $270M FROM SECRET DONORS IN RECENT YEARS AS HE DECRIED DARK MONEY “Last Best Place PAC is masquerading as a local Montana operation while quietly laundering millions of dollars from DC liberals,” APT executive director Caitlin Sutherland told Fox News Digital.  “Spending massive sums of money to impact this election without filing the legally required reports flies in the face of the letter and spirit of our election laws,” Sutherland continued. “This behavior warrants an immediate investigation by the FEC in order to uphold the basic standards of transparency and public trust.” BLAKE MASTERS’ CAMPAIGN SHARED MISLEADING FUNDRAISING NUMBERS, FAILED TO DISCLOSE CANDIDATE LOANED $1 MILLION Within the complaint filed to the FEC on Monday morning, APT says that the Last Best Place PAC has “made independent expenditures aggregating $10,000 or more in a calendar year,” and reporting had indicated as much. Therefore, the Last Best Place PAC was required to submit independent expenditure reports displaying their ad buys but neglected to do so. The Last Best Place PAC’s recently filed year-end report also shed light on its media expenditures. According to its filing, the PAC poured over $2.1 million into media buys and production costs between early September and late December with Waterfront Strategies and Mountain Media.  APT’s complaint states the committee “is failing to meet the legal requirements and basic standards of transparency to which every other independent expenditure committee is required to adhere” and called on the FEC to immediately investigate and “determine and impose appropriate sanctions for any and all violations.” The most recent attempt to stir up the Montana Republican primary, where Sheehy faces a potential challenge from Rep. Matt Rosendale, R-Mont., is only the latest of Schumer-tied groups receiving criticism for meddling in GOP races. In the Big Sky State, Last Best Place PAC is reportedly planning to spend over $5 million attacking Sheehy in the race to unseat vulnerable Democrat Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., according to AdImpact. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP “The career politicians back in DC are terrified of conservative outsider Tim Sheehy because he’s going to stand shoulder to shoulder with President Trump to drain the swamp, save our country, and put America and Montana First!” Sheehy told Fox News Digital after the Senate Majority PAC confirmed to Fox News Digital they are behind the Last Best Place PAC. Fox News Digital has reached out to the Senate Majority PAC for comment on the complaint.