Trump’s Iran ultimatum started a 60-day clock ticking for decisive June strikes, bomber commander reveals
When President Donald Trump drew a red line on Iran’s nuclear program, U.S. bombers immediately began preparing to enforce it, according to the general who commanded June’s strike mission. And, Maj. Gen. Jason Armagost told Fox News Digital, the operation proved decisive: “We reestablished deterrence, and all of our adversaries watched that.” In the spring, Trump wrote a letter to Ayatollah Ali Khamenei demanding “progress” in nuclear talks and offering a 60-day deadline. When he learned Trump gave the two-month ultimatum, Armagost, commander of the 8th Air Force and all bomber forces, immediately began setting a plan in motion to present the president with strike options. PENTAGON FLEXES US MILITARY’S DECOYS AND STRATEGIC DECEPTION THAT TOOK IRAN AND WORLD BY SURPRISE White House envoy Steve Witkoff met with Iranian representatives in Oman, but negotiations reportedly stalled out over Iranian demands for what they called a civil nuclear enrichment capacity. “Two months ago, I gave Iran a 60-day ultimatum to ‘make a deal.’ They should have done it! Today is day 61. I told them what to do, but they just couldn’t get there. Now they have, perhaps, a second chance!” Trump wrote after the strikes. “When I heard that [60-day warning], immediately in my head I said, OK, we’ve got 60 days… we knew we would be a military option at the expiration of that,” Armagost said. Mission planning was “far more expansive” than the single round of strikes that B-2 bomber crews ended up executing. “We’re building readiness to be ready to do numerous options that would support, potentially, a campaign, right? This was a strategic attack, but we look at all the time, at, OK, what is the next thing that has to happen? Or might we be asked to do?” Luckily, the Iranian nuclear sites were in remote areas, so planners did not have to account for civilian casualty rates. But still, they got to planning every detail, down to who would be in the facilities at the time of impact. Then, 14 B-2 pilots flying seven stealth bombers prepared for the 30-hour journey from Whiteman, Missouri, to Iran and back. They dropped 14 massive ordnance penetrators (MOPs) on Iran’s nuclear sites deep underground. “Global operations are hard,” said Armagost. “You go through different weather, you go through daylight cycles that are abnormal because you’re flying eastbound and then westbound… intellectually, it’s demanding.” Aerial refueling tankers made the marathon mission possible. Clouds, weather shifts and even the failure of a single refueling jet could have jeopardized the strike, Armagost said. But meticulous planning and backup tracks kept the B-2s airborne. “That’s really what makes us arguably a superpower,” he said. “Russia’s and China’s bomber forces are regional, not global.” The general said the public should not measure success simply by the precision of the strike, but by the deterrent effect it produced. A FULL BREAKDOWN OF OPERATION MIDNIGHT HAMMER, THE ‘LARGEST B-2 OPERATIONAL STRIKE IN US HISTORY’ “About 30 hours after the attack, there was a ceasefire,” Armagost said. “Clearly the Iranians saw that, and saw the path forward had changed dramatically. All of our adversaries watch that, and they will make different choices as a result.” Khamenei warned after the strikes: “Americans should expect greater damage and blows than ever before.” The regime struck a U.S. airbase in Qatar, al-Udeid, but damage was minimal and no one was injured. Israel and Iran agreed to a ceasefire days later on June 24. Armagost also acknowledged the strain on America’s bomber force. At the height of the Cold War, the U.S. had around 770 long-range bombers across 36 wings. Today, that number has dwindled to about 140 bombers in total. Now, the Air Force looks to the B-21, the next-generation stealth bomber and successor of the B-2. That plane is expected to be easier to update with new technologies and cost less than half the price: around $800 million instead of $2 billion. The Air Force plans to acquire around 100 B-21s, though discussions are underway if the service branch may need more. “It’s a national-level discussion,” said Armagost. “We have to decide as a country or with our partners and allies, what kind of ability we need to have to project force around the world facing multiple or multiple adversaries, who in some cases will, will, coordinate and act together to disrupt us.” Armagost compared Operation Midnight Hammer to another historic mission of the 509th Bomb Wing, which dropped bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki 80 years ago, killing 200,000 and ending a world war. “There’s about six weeks’ difference,” Armagost said. “Both were strategic attacks that changed history.” “Nobody wants to see Iran with nuclear weapons. This was about reestablishing deterrence against a regime that everyone knows would be destabilizing with that capability.”
GOP erupts on Dem running for attorney general in red state over profanity-laced Charlie Kirk post
A Democrat running to be the top law enforcement official in the state of Ohio is facing backlash for a series of social media posts disparaging Charlie Kirk in the days after the conservative activist was assassinated. “F*** Charlie Kirk,” Elliot Forhan, Ohio Democratic candidate for attorney general and former state representative, posted on Facebook on Monday, days after Kirk was gunned down while speaking to a large gathering of students at a Utah university. “Charlie Kirk was a champion of tyranny, not democracy,” Forhan said in another post. “We should not pretend otherwise.” In another Facebook entry, Forhan shared an article with the headline, “Charlie Kirk was a champion of tyranny, not democracy. We should not pretend otherwise.” TOP UNIVERSITY ADMINISTRATOR CALLS CHARLIE KIRK ASSASSINATION ‘FAIR’ DUE TO STANCE ON GUNS: ‘NO PRAYERS’ Forhan’s social media posts have prompted significant pushback, both on the internet and from Republicans in the state, with many calling on him to withdraw from the race. “No public servant should say that about any human being, much less somebody who was just assassinated,” Ohio’s current attorney general, Republican Dave Yost, told Fox News Digital. “He just proved himself to be a petulant and undisciplined child, ill-suited to public office.” Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose, a Republican, told Fox News Digital that Forhan’s posts are “probably demented publicity designed to get attention” and “score cheap political points.” LaRose added that “this kind of rhetoric” is becoming more “mainstream” in today’s Democratic Party. YOUNG PEOPLE RESTORE CHARLIE KIRK MEMORIAL MURAL WITH BIBLE VERSES AFTER VANDALS DEFACE TRIBUTE “But this kind of rhetoric is becoming all too mainstream in the Democratic Party, and this is coming from a person seeking to become their nominee for a top statewide office,” LaRose continued. “This guy was literally the target of a law enforcement investigation that called his behavior ‘a credible risk of escalating to violence or violent conduct.’ He should be watched carefully and denounced aggressively. Elliot Forhan and people like him are quickly becoming the face of the Democratic Party.” Fox News Digital also spoke to Ohio attorney and Republican National Committee (RNC) surrogate Mehek Cooke, who said Forhan “must immediately withdraw” from the attorney general race. “Ohio’s top law enforcement officer must serve as a guardian and defender of justice, not a cheerleader for violence,” Cooke said. “A man who celebrates murder cannot lecture anyone on equality, fairness, or justice, let alone serve Ohioans. This is moral rot that we won’t tolerate.” “Violence is wrong,” Forhan said in a statement to Fox News Digital. “That was my very first statement when I learned that Charlie Kirk was murdered. My thoughts and prayers were and still are with his family and loved ones. Glorifying Kirk and his movement of bigotry and violence is also wrong, yet many public figures and even NFL teams are engaging in it. People are being fired from their jobs and terrorized by the Trump administration for repeating Charlie Kirk’s own words.” Forhan continued, “The Vice President himself is targeting Americans from the host chair of Kirk’s podcast. I expressed anger over the whitewashing of Kirk’s legacy of bigotry and hate. That is my First Amendment right.” Forhan said that he has been “targeted” by conservative social media influencers online. “I’ve received now thousands of vile comments, texts, emails, and voicemails,” Forhan said. “I stand together with the people whom Charlie Kirk targeted and whom the Trump administration and other Republicans are targeting today.” Forhan also told Fox News Digital that Yost should resign from office and LaRose should drop out of the race for state auditor for “glorifying the racism and bigotry” of Kirk. In the wake of Kirk’s death, numerous individuals both in government and the private sector have been publicly called out on social media for posting comments mocking or celebrating the death of the conservative activist. The White House is seeking additional security funds from Congress for the executive and judicial branches as it navigates the aftermath of the assassination, Fox News Digital reported this week.
‘Most transparent’ FBI ever: Patel updates Senate on Kirk assassination probe
FBI Director Kash Patel vowed that the bureau would continue on a quest for transparency during his testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee as criticism of his handling of the Charlie Kirk assassination investigation lingers. In his opening statement to the committee obtained by Fox News Digital, Patel listed a series of accomplishments the agency has achieved since President Donald Trump took office, including tens of thousands of arrests, a realignment of the agency and an emphasis on cracking down on illicit drugs. Patel acknowledged the growing criticism over his direction of the FBI and challenged lawmakers on the panel to come after him. “I’m not going anywhere,” he said. “If you want to criticize my 16 years of service, please bring it on.” Patel kicked off his testimony by offering an update on the FBI’s investigation into the “appalling assassination of Charlie Kirk.” KASH PATEL’S FBI LEADERSHIP UNDER SCRUTINY AHEAD OF SENATE JUDICIARY OVERSIGHT HEARING “It’s important that the FBI is as transparent as possible without jeopardizing our investigation,” Patel said. The FBI chief listed off numerous findings in the case, including an “extensive review” of suspect Tyler Robinson’s accounts and devices. He said over 100 interviews had been conducted since the shooting, and that the FBI has received over 11,000 submissions through the National Threat Operations Center and over 16,000 submissions through the Digital Media Tipline. “We are making a traditionally nontransparent agency the most transparent it has ever been,” Patel said. He lauded the public participation in the case, too, and noted that the tens of thousands of tips that poured in helped identify a suspect. “Tyler Robinson is in custody today because of this partnership,” he said. KNIVES ARE OUT FOR EMBATTLED FBI DIRECTOR KASH PATEL, DESPITE TRUMP SUPPORT Patel’s appearance before the committee had been on the books for weeks before Kirk’s death and was initially geared as an annual oversight hearing of the FBI. However, his handling of the investigation, social media misfires and a wave of firings at the agency have generated fresh scrutiny over his leadership. Patel came under the microscope for a post he made on X in the hours after Kirk was killed, where he wrote, “The subject for the horrific shooting today that took the life of Charlie Kirk is now in custody.” However, that individual and another were caught and released before law enforcement nabbed 22-year-old Robinson, some 33 hours after the shooting. Senate Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, addressed Kirk briefly in his opening remarks, saying, “God Bless you, Charlie Kirk.” The chair, who has advocated for whistleblowers for decades, then dove into lengthy remarks about government weaponization and praised Patel for compensating what he said were 10 FBI employees who lost their security clearances in recent years. “In the short amount of time you’ve been director, you’ve corrected whistleblower retaliation and increased transparency more than any other FBI director I’ve seen, and I’ve been around here more than anyone else on this committee,” Grassley said. KASH PATEL TORCHES ‘CONSPIRACY THEORIES’ ABOUT BONDI FEUD AMID MAGA FUROR OVER EPSTEIN FILES But the top Democrat on the committee, Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., zeroed in on the wide swath of DOJ and FBI personnel who have been fired, sometimes without explanation, a topic expected to crop up repeatedly during Democrats’ questioning. Durbin criticized Patel’s deference to Trump, saying the director “installed MAGA loyalists” to key positions and initiated internal “loyalty tests,” including polygraph tests. Durbin revealed that some FBI officials failed those tests and needed waivers to continue working at the bureau. He noted the recent lawsuit brought by three ousted top FBI officials, who have accused Patel of unconstitutionally firing them and wielding the president’s Article II powers to do so. Durbin also noted that Patel has little experience working in law enforcement, calling his inexperience “staggering” and accusing him of fast-tracking similarly unqualified recruits to fill the FBI’s open jobs. Patel repeatedly stressed that he has made strides to transform the agency into a more transparent organization and used the “Epstein files” as an example. Earlier this year a memo from the DOJ and FBI stated that “it is the determination of the Department of Justice and the Federal Bureau of Investigation that no further disclosure would be appropriate or warranted,” after investigating the tens of thousands of documents associated with Jeffrey Epstein. That triggered a firestorm on Capitol Hill that is still roiling. Prior to becoming director, Patel had promoted the idea that the government was hiding a secret list of sexual predators affiliated with Epstein. Patel during the hearing argued that the “original sin” of the Epstein case began in the early 2000s, where “very limited search warrants that didn’t intake as much material into the FBI possession as it should have” were issued. “If I were FBI director then, I wouldn’t have allowed such a limited search warrant to be issued for these types of atrocious offenses,” he said. He argued that under former U.S. Attorney Alex Acosta, Epstein was allowed to enter into a plea deal with non-prosecution agreements, “plus the courts issued protective orders and sealed large volumes of material from ever being disclosed.” “The non-prosecution barred any future criminal culpability for this entire time period,” Patel said. “Still, this administration has done more than any of the previous administrations to seek transparency in this case.” “[The] DOJ has made motions to the court to unseal grand jury records on multiple occasions, but the courts have denied these motions,” he continued. “Further, it was the first Trump administration that brought the renewed case against Epstein in 2019. Under the direction of this president, we have turned over ALL credible information in conjunction with our partners in Congress.”
Trump trial continues with more FBI testimony after rifle called ‘prepared to fire’
The federal trial of Ryan Routh, accused of attempting to assassinate President Donald Trump as he played golf in September 2024, resumes Tuesday with more FBI forensic experts scheduled to testify. On Monday, jurors heard FBI Firearms and Toolmarks Examiner Erich Smith, who alleged the rifle found near the sixth hole of Trump International Golf Club was a Chinese-made Norinco SKS. Smith said the weapon was “in working condition” when recovered, test-fired successfully at the FBI lab, and was configured with a round in the chamber and the safety off — meaning it was “prepared to fire.” He also testified the rifle’s serial number had been “obliterated in several places” but could be partially restored. FLASHLIGHT, RIFLE, BACKPACKS: PROSECUTORS OUTLINE RYAN ROUTH’S ALLEGED SNIPER SETUP Smith showed jurors the 7.62×39 mm full metal jacket rounds loaded in the rifle. “Bullets are designed to put holes in things,” he said. “It would have put a hole in something if it had hit the target.” Routh, representing himself, cross-examined Smith about whether all SKS rifles are semi-automatic, whether test-firings were videotaped and whether the gun could have changed hands at a gun show before he obtained it. “So, we’re just supposed to take your word for it?“ Routh asked Smith. RYAN ROUTH CHASTISED DURING OPENING STATEMENTS IN FEDERAL TRIAL FOR ‘MAKING A MOCKERY’ OF THE COURT Smith replied: “That’s what happened.” Trump-appointed Judge Aileen Cannon sustained prosecution objections when Routh strayed beyond the scope of testimony. The court also heard from FBI biologist Curtis Gaul, who testified about collecting potential DNA samples from the rifle grip, a glove, zip ties and other items found. Routh cross-examined briefly, asking where the glove was found and whether Gaul knew who removed the rifle’s scope. Cannon cut off questioning several times, urging both prosecutors and Routh to keep examinations moving. RYAN ROUTH TRIAL: JURY SELECTION BEGINS IN TRUMP ASSASSINATION ATTEMPT CASE CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Jurors appeared confused during parts of Gaul’s testimony, as prosecutors referenced exhibit numbers without always displaying them. Meanwhile, Routh was seen leaning forward, taking notes and staring intently when fingerprints reportedly matching his own were displayed on a screen. When court resumes Tuesday morning, prosecutors are expected to call FBI biologist Kara Gregor, followed by additional FBI specialists in digital forensics and supervisory roles as they continue building their case against Routh.
Belarusians detained after drone flown over Polish president’s residence
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk says an investigation is under way after drone spotted over government buildings in Warsaw. Authorities in Poland have said that two Belarusian citizens were detained and a drone was “neutralised” after it was flown over government buildings and the presidential residence in the capital city, Warsaw. Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk said early on Tuesday that members of the country’s State Protection Services apprehended the two Belarusians, and police were “investigating the circumstances of the incident”. Recommended Stories list of 4 itemsend of list The Associated Press news agency quoted Colonel Boguslaw Piorkowski, a spokesperson for the protection service, saying that the drone was not shot down by Polish forces but landed after authorities apprehended the operators. “The impression is that this is not something that flew in from abroad but rather launched locally,” Katarzyna Pelczynska-Nalecz, Poland’s minister of development funds and regional policy, told local media outlet TVN 24, according to the AP. The minister also advised the public against rushing to conclusions or associating the incident with last week’s high-profile incursion by multiple Russian drones into Polish airspace during an aerial attack on neighbouring Ukraine, the AP reported. Przed chwilą Służba Ochrony Państwa zneutralizowała drona operującego nad budynkami rządowymi (Parkowa) i Belwederem. Zatrzymano dwóch obywateli Białorusi. Policja bada okoliczności incydentu. — Donald Tusk (@donaldtusk) September 15, 2025 Translation: Just now, the State Protection Service neutralised a drone operating over government buildings (Parkowa) and the Belweder. Two Belarusian citizens were detained. The police are investigating the circumstances of the incident. The reported arrest of the Belarusian drone operators by Polish authorities comes as thousands of troops from Belarus and Russia take part in the “Zapad (West) 2025” military drills, which kicked off on Friday and are due to end on Tuesday. Advertisement Poland, Latvia and Lithuania, which border Belarus, closed their frontier crossings and bolstered defences in advance of the exercises, which authorities in Minsk said involve 6,000 soldiers from Belarus and 1,000 from Russia. Poland is also on high alert after last week’s Russian drone incursions, which led to Polish and NATO fighter jets mobilising to defend against what was described as an “unprecedented violation of Polish airspace” by Moscow. Polish F-16 and Dutch F-35 fighter jets, as well as Italian AWACS surveillance planes, deployed to counter the drones, marking the first time that NATO-allied forces have engaged Russian military assets since Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. One of the drones damaged a residential building in Wyryki, eastern Poland, though nobody was reported injured, according to the Reuters news agency. On Friday, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte announced that the Western military alliance would increase its defence “posture” in Eastern Europe following the Polish airspace violation. Operation “Eastern Sentry” will include military assets from a range of NATO members, including Denmark, France, Germany and the United Kingdom, Rutte said, describing the incursion as “reckless” and “unacceptable”. Amid the increased tension with Russia, NATO member Romania also reported a drone incursion on Saturday, which led to the scrambling of two F-16 fighter jets as well as two Eurofighters and a warning to Romanian citizens to take cover. Romanian Minister of National Defence Ionut Mosteanu said the fighter jets came close to shooting down the drone before it exited Romanian airspace into neighbouring Ukraine. Moscow’s ambassador to Romania was summoned by the Ministry of Foreign Affairs on Sunday, where Bucharest “conveyed its strong protest against this unacceptable and irresponsible act, which constitutes a violation of [its] sovereignty”. Russia was “urgently requested… to prevent any future violations”, the Romanian Foreign Ministry said in a statement. Adblock test (Why?)
Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka: Is South Asia fertile for Gen Z revolutions?
New Delhi, India — The rattle of iron gates sounded like drumbeats as the crowd surged forward. A sea of bodies stormed through the barricades, which had stood as sentinels of power barely hours ago. The hallways of the house of the country’s leader echoed with the thunder of muddy footsteps. Some smashed windows and artefacts, others picked up luxury bedsheets or shoes. The building and its plush interiors had been symbols of crushing authority, impenetrable and out of reach for the country’s teeming millions. Now, however, they briefly belonged to the people. This was Nepal last week. It was also Sri Lanka in 2022, and Bangladesh in 2024. As Nepal, a country of 30 million people sandwiched between India and China, now plots its future in ways alien to traditional electoral democracies, the spate of youth-led protest movements that have toppled governments one after the other in South Asia has also sparked a broader question: Is the world’s most densely populated region Ground Zero for Gen Z revolutions? “It’s certainly very striking. There’s this kind of new politics of instability,” said Paul Staniland, an associate professor of political science at the University of Chicago, whose research focuses on political violence and international security in South Asia. On Thursday, some 10,000 Nepali youth, including many in the diaspora, voted for an interim prime minister not through physical or electoral ballots, but through an online poll on Discord, a platform primarily used by gamers. Nepal, where three days of protests against corruption and nepotism turned violent, with a crackdown by security forces leading to the death of more than 70 people, has announced new elections in March. Advertisement But the protests, which forced Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli to resign days after he had mocked the Gen Z origins of the agitators, have already shown that in nation after nation in South Asia, increasingly frustrated young people are grabbing power and declaring themselves boss when they feel betrayed by political systems out of tune with their demands. This is a dramatic shift for South Asia, a region that has long been home to major political protests, but rarely ones where regimes are overthrown, Staniland told Al Jazeera. “This is a very different kind of orientation from a world that has military coups, or the main form of political conflict is something else,” he added, referring to the ways political crises in the region have previously often played out. Each of the protest movements – in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh and Nepal – was rooted in specific histories and was triggered by events unique to that country. Yet, analysts say, there is a common thread that runs through the rage that exploded in these countries: a generation that is refusing to live with broken promises, and the factors driving them. These movements, experts say, also appear to be learning from each other. From Colombo to Dhaka to Kathmandu: The backdrop The Gen-Z protests in Kathmandu kicked off after the government banned social media platforms, citing misuse and the failure of the platforms to register with regulators. But the grievances ran much deeper: inequality, corruption and nepotism were the major triggers for young people in a country where remittances sent home by Nepalis abroad represent a third of the nation’s economy. Thousands of teenagers hit the streets, many still in school uniforms. More than 70 people were shot dead, and hundreds more were injured. But the violence unleashed on protesters by security forces only aggravated the crisis. Some demonstrators torched the parliament, while others set the houses of other political parties, some leaders, and even Nepal’s largest media house on fire. Protesters also broke into Oli’s house, ransacking it. Oli resigned a day later. It was very different in Bangladesh in 2024. There, it began with a student-led campaign against discriminatory job quotas. But by the summer, after a series of police crackdowns on mostly peaceful protesters killed hundreds of civilians, the movement’s character shifted to a broad coalition demanding an end to Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina’s long hardline government. Protests had a loose leadership structure: student leaders issued ultimatums and lists of demands to the government, and opposition figures provided support. Everything Hanisa’s government did – from brutal assaults on student agitators to telecommunications blackouts – only aggravated the crisis. Ultimately, on August 5, 2024, the prime minister quit, escaping to close ally India by helicopter. Advertisement Two years before the upheaval in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka had its own moment. There, the protests were a response to an economic collapse as Sri Lanka defaulted on its debt. By March 2022, daily life had become dire: 12-hour power blackouts, miles-long queues for fuel and cooking gas, and inflation above 50 percent. Sri Lanka’s “Aragalaya” movement, which stands for “The Struggle” in Sinhala, was born. Youth activists set up a protest camp they called “GotaGoGama” (“Gotta Go Village”), in front of Colombo’s Presidential Secretariat. It was a reference to President Gotabaya Rajapaksa, whose family had governed the country for 15 of the previous 18 years. The site became a hub of rallies, art performances and speeches. In mid-July, Rajapaksa fled the country after his residence was overrun by demonstrators. Demonstrators capture footage on their mobile phones outside the Parliament complex, during a protest against the killing of 19 people, after anticorruption protests and during a curfew in Kathmandu, Nepal, September 9, 2025 [Adnan Abidi/Reuters] ‘Dissonance was too high’ To Meenakshi Ganguly, deputy Asia director of Human Rights Watch, the overthrow of powerful governments by youth-led movements in the three countries has common foundations: unaddressed socioeconomic disparities and corruption by an entrenched political elite that left them disconnected from the challenges of younger generations. Many in Gen Z have experienced two economic recessions in their lifetimes: in 2008-09 and then in the wake of COVID-19. Ganguly said that the generation had also two formative years in isolation, cut off from their peers physically, though those pandemic years also amplified their use of digital platforms to unprecedented
Suspect in Charlie Kirk’s murder linked to scene by DNA, FBI chief says
DNA evidence links the suspect in the assassination of the conservative American activist Charlie Kirk last week to the scene of the crime, the director of the FBI has said. DNA from a towel and a screwdriver recovered from the crime scene both match Tyler Robinson, FBI Director Kash Patel said on Monday. Recommended Stories list of 4 itemsend of list Robinson, 22, was arrested by police on Thursday after a 33-hour manhunt for the killer. “I can report today that the DNA hits from the towel that was wrapped around the firearm and the DNA on the screwdriver are positively processed for the suspect in custody,” Patel said in an interview on Fox News’s Fox & Friends. Patel said Robinson had also expressed his desire to “take out” Kirk in a text exchange with another person, and had written a note detailing his plans to commit the crime. Patel said the note had been destroyed, but investigators recovered forensic evidence of its existence at the home of Robinson and his romantic partner, who prosecutors have said has been cooperating in the investigation. “We have evidence to show what was in that note, which is… basically saying… ‘I have the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I’m going to take it’,” he said. Kirk, the CEO and cofounder of conservative youth activist organisation Turning Point USA and a close ally of US President Donald Trump, was shot dead last Wednesday during a speaking event at a university in Utah. The killing of Kirk, a polarising figure who was lionised by conservatives and reviled by liberals, has provoked condemnation across the political spectrum, while drawing attention to deep political divisions in the United States and raising fears of further political violence. Advertisement The murder has also prompted calls for retribution among the political right, including from Trump, who has promised to use the power of the federal government to crack down on left-wing networks that he claims are driving violence. On Monday, Trump said his administration was looking into bringing racketeering charges against left-wing groups believed to be funding agitators, and favoured designating the loose-knit antifascist group Antifa as domestic terrorists. In an appearance as guest host of Kirk’s podcast, Vice President JD Vance threw his support behind a grassroots online campaign to get people who celebrated Kirk’s death fired, urging listeners to “call them out” and “call their employer.” Numerous employees across the US have been fired or put on leave over their social media commentary about Kirk’s death, not all of whom celebrated or justified the assassination. Washington Post columnist Karen Attiah said on Monday that she had been fired over her social media posts about Kirk. In a column on Substack, Attiah said she had been terminated for “speaking out against political violence, racial double standards, and America’s apathy toward guns.” Attiah included a number of past posts about political violence in her column, only one of which mentioned Kirk specifically. That posted misquoted Kirk as saying that black women “do not not have the brain processing power to be taken seriously.” Kirk’s actual comments specifically referred to the intelligence of four black women, including former first lady Michelle Obama and Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson. Trump’s pledge to crack down on what he says is left-wing extremism has raised fears that his administration may seek to use Kirk’s murder as a pretext to stifle legitimate dissent. Responding to a claim by Vance that “most of the lunatics” in US politics reside on the far-left, Democratic lawmaker Greg Casar accused the Trump administration of weaponising concerns about political violence against its opponents. “He cannot be allowed to use the horrible murder of Charlie Kirk as a pretext to go after peaceful political opposition,” Casar, who represents a Texas district in the US House of Representatives, said in a statement. High-profile acts of political violence have targeted figures on both the left and right of US politics in recent years. They include the killing of a Democratic state lawmaker and her husband in Minnesota in June, two assassination attempts on Trump during the 2024 presidential campaign, and a 2022 hammer attack on the husband of Democratic former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. Advertisement Experts say that politically motivated attacks and threats are on the rise in the US. More than 250 incidents of threats and harassment against local officials were reported in the first half of 2025, a 9 percent increase from the previous year, according to the Bridging Divides Initiative at Princeton University. While little information has been released about Robinson’s suspected motive so far, Patel on Monday affirmed an earlier assertion by Utah Governor Spencer Cox that the suspect espoused left-wing views. “His family has collectively told investigators that he subscribed to left-wing ideology, and even more so in these last couple of years,” Patel said. Adblock test (Why?)
Madhya Pradesh: Two killed after truck runs over pedestrians in Indore, catches fire
Police said the driver was highly inebriated and lost control of the vehicle, which led to this accident.
Smriti Irani issues BIG statement on PM Modi: ‘Anybody who says they’re close to him…’
Irani also reflected on her own political journey including her ministerial roles, her time working directly under the PM, and credited him with giving her those chances. But again, she doubled down, those opportunities were about performance and service, not personal closeness. Read on for more.
India-US trade talks to resume today amid tariff war as Washington’s top negotiator arrives in New Delhi
The move highlights a reversal in bilateral ties and raises hopes for a breakthrough on a free trade agreement that was put in jeopardy by the punitive tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump on India for purchasing Russian oil.