Timeline of ‘scam artist’ Adam Schiff’s mortgage fraud allegations stretching back years

Longtime President Donald Trump political foe Democrat California Sen. Adam Schiff was referred to the Department of Justice to face criminal prosecution over alleged mortgage fraud that reportedly stretches back years. Schiff, who was elected to the Senate in the 2024 election cycle following decades as a House lawmaker, is under scrutiny after the U.S. Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) sent a letter to the Department of Justice in May sounding the alarm that in “multiple instances,” Schiff allegedly “falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, impacting payments from 2003-2019 for a Potomac, Maryland-based property.” FHFA is an independent federal agency that oversees Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Home Loan Bank System. This week, Trump publicly lambasted Schiff over the alleged mortgage fraud, while Fannie Mae’s financial crimes investigations concluded Monday in a letter to the FHFA that Schiff allegedly engaged in “a sustained pattern of possible occupancy misrepresentation” on five Fannie Mae loans, Fox News Digital previously reported this week. WATCH: ADAM SCHIFF SILENT AFTER TRUMP ACCUSED HIM OF MORTGAGE FRAUD “I have always suspected Shifty Adam Schiff was a scam artist,” Trump posted to Truth Social Tuesday. “And now I learn that Fannie Mae’s Financial Crimes Division have concluded that Adam Schiff has engaged in a sustained pattern of possible Mortgage Fraud.” “Adam Schiff said that his primary residence was in MARYLAND to get a cheaper mortgage and rip off America, when he must LIVE in CALIFORNIA because he was a Congressman from CALIFORNIA. I always knew Adam Schiff was a Crook. The FRAUD began with the refinance of his Maryland property on February 6, 2009, and continued through multiple transactions until the Maryland property was correctly designated as a second home on October 13, 2020.” Potomac, Maryland, is a suburb of Washington, D.C., located just more than 10 miles away from the nation’s capital across the Maryland border. FEDERAL HOUSING OFFICIAL SUBMITTED SCHIFF CRIMINAL REFERRAL TO DOJ OVER MORTGAGE DOCUMENTS Trump and Schiff have long been political foes, which was underscored during Trump’s first administration when Schiff served as the lead House manager during the first impeachment trial against Trump in 2020 and when Schiff repeatedly promoted claims that Trump’s 2016 campaign colluded with Russia Fox News Digital took a look back at the timeline of Schiff’s Maryland home, and when the public was first made aware in 2023 of allegations that Schiff claimed a more than 3,000-square-foot home in the suburbs of Washington as his primary residence, while taking a homeowner’s tax exemption on a small condo in his home state of California. TRUMP ACCUSES ‘SCAM ARTIST’ SCHIFF OF LYING ABOUT MARYLAND HOME TO COMMIT MORTGAGE FRAUD LETITIA JAMES REAPS WHAT SHE SOWS AFTER LEVELING ‘LAUGHABLE’ CASE AT TRUMP: EXPERT The investigation into Schiff’s mortgages and homes follows a similar mortgage investigation earlier in 2025 focused on New York Attorney General Letitia James, who is also a longtime political Trump foe. The FHFA sent a criminal referral to the Department of Justice in April arguing the attorney general appeared to have falsified mortgage records to obtain more favorable loans. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP At the heart of that case is a Norfolk, Virginia, home James purchased in 2023, which she identified on mortgage documents and a Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac form as a property that would serve as her primary residence, according to the FHFA letter from April. James is legally required to live in New York as a statewide elected official in the Empire State. Fox News Digital reached out to Schiff’s office for additional comment on the matter, but did not immediately receive a reply. Fox News Digital’s Danielle Wallace and Michael Dorgan contributed to this report.
‘Dear God’: Democrats storm out of vote on controversial Trump nominee

Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee stormed out of an executive committee meeting Thursday moments before the panel voted to advance President Donald Trump‘s judicial nominee, Emil Bove, to the full Senate floor for a vote. Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J., urged Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, before the vote to allow them to consider the allegations against Bove made by a former Justice Department attorney, Erez Reuveni, in a whistleblower report. Booker invoked Rule 4 of the committee rules in trying to push for additional debate time, which Grassley declined to acknowledge before ordering the vote — prompting the Democrat members of the panel to abruptly exit the hearing room. Shortly before walking out, Booker took aim at Grassley. “What are you afraid of?” he erupted, after Grassley tried to speak over him and hold the vote. “Debating this [nomination], putting things on the record — Dear God,” he said, “that’s what we are here for.” TRUMP CONSIDERS FORMER DEFENSE ATTORNEY EMIL BOVE FOR FEDERAL APPEALS COURT VACANCY “This lacks decency, this lacks decorum, it shows that you will not hear from your colleagues,” Booker said to Grassley in another attempt. “You are a decent man,” he said, imploring him to allow a small window of additional time for the panel to debate before pushing through with the committee vote. “Why are you doing this?” Booker pressed again. “What are they saying to you,” he said, referring to the Trump administration, “that is making you do something to violate the decorum, the decency and the respect of this committee to at least hear each other out?” The nearly hour-long debate held prior to Bove’s confirmation vote was unsuccessful, and Trump’s nominee cleared the committee in a party-line vote. Still, there were sharp objections made by other Democrats on the committee, including Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-NY. They upbraided their colleageus on the Republican-led panel for their lack of candor and refusal to consider the allegations made by Reuveni—as well as the objections made by dozens of former state and federal judges, and hundreds of former federal prosecutors, who had urged them against confirming Bove to a lifetime appointment on the federal bench. Whitehouse, for his part, invoked Shakespeare, declaring, “There’s something rotten in Denmark,” before streaming out of the room. Trump announced earlier this year the nomination of senior Justice Department official and his former defense attorney, Emil Bove, to serve on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, a controversial choice that comes as the president continues to attack so-called “activist” judges for blocking his agenda. His path to confirmation in the full Senate chamber remains rocky, and comes amid mounting concerns over the allegations made in the whistleblower report. Speaking to reporters after leaving the committee room on Thursday, Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-CT, described the decision by Republicans to push through with the vote without considering the whistleblower allegations in a separate hearing, and despite the state objections of Democrats on the panel as a “blatant violation of the rules of committee.” “I haven’t seen anything like it in 15 years in the U.S. Senate,” he told reporters. “Just overriding, roughshod, the rules of the committee to silence members [on concerns involving] the nominees for lifetime appointments” on the federal bench, he said. “We can disagree about whether they should be on the court, but not about the rules that put them there.” This is a breaking news story. Check back for updates.
Army secretary vows ‘grievous error’ targeting pro-life groups will never happen again

FIRST ON FOX: Army Secretary Dan Driscoll called a set of training slides that deemed pro-life groups as terrorist organizations a “grievous error” that he’ll work to ensure doesn’t happen again, in a letter obtained by Fox News Digital. “This characterization was not only inaccurate but also deeply inappropriate,” Driscoll wrote to a group of attorneys for the American Center for Law and Justice, who represented the pro-life groups affected. Thousands of soldiers at Fort Bragg were trained in counter-terrorism and security practices with slides that listed groups such as National Right to Life and Operation Rescue alongside recognized extremist organizations, and even pointed to pro‑life license plates as potential warning signs. The practice went on for seven years, until 2024. “Equally concerning was the previous administration’s inadequate response to this serious incident. Its failure to provide full transparency or take responsibility for such a grievous error is wholly unacceptable.” HEGSETH ABRUPTLY PULLS PENTAGON OFFICIALS FROM ‘GLOBALIST’ ASPEN CONFERENCE Driscoll said the Army has since reviewed all security training materials, including anti-terrorism training, and removed the slides that referenced pro-life groups, along with a slew of pro-animal and green groups like PETA, as “terrorist organizations.” “Please be assured that I am firmly committed to rigorous oversight of all Army training materials to prevent such incidents from occurring in the future.” ‘EYES IN THE SKY’: ARMY DRONE EXPERT EXPLAINS US STRATEGY ON INNOVATION AS GLOBAL CONFLICT LOOMS Agnes Schaefer, assistant secretary of the Army for manpower and Reserve affairs, said that the training deck, which was used to teach 9,100 Army soldiers, was “inconsistent with Army’s antiterrorism policy and training.” The training module was used to instruct soldiers on what to look out for when guarding points of base access. She claimed there is “no evidence” to suggest the individual who created the slide deck did so to “deliberately subvert” Army policy or to “further a personal viewpoint.” The slides caused a stir among congressional Republicans, who demanded answers from Army officials in a hearing last year and took issue with Schaefer’s assurances the slide did not represent a personal viewpoint. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP “It’s downright ridiculous to claim the slide deck doesn’t ‘further a personal viewpoint,’ but there have been no consequences for the employee who ran anti-life training sessions at Fort Liberty that clearly violated Army policy,” Sen. Jim Banks, R-Ind., told Fox News Digital in September. It’s not clear if anyone involved in the slide’s production and use has been fired or reprimanded.
Civil rights group declares ‘state of emergency,’ pointing at Trump admin

The National Urban League is sounding the alarm, asserting that there is a “state of emergency” in the country. The organization’s “State of Black America” report for 2025 titled “State of Emergency: Democracy, Civil Rights, and Progress Under Attack,” takes aim at the Trump administration. “Almost daily, since January 20, 2025, the federal government, at the direction of the White House, has set fire to policies and entire departments dedicated to protecting civil and human rights, providing access to an equal education, fair housing, safe and effective healthcare, and ensuring that our democratic process is adhered to across the nation,” the report claims. EXCLUSIVE: TRUMP ADMIN STRENGTHENS RELIGIOUS ACCOMODATIONS IN FEDERAL WORKFORCE White House spokesman Harrison Fields pushed back in a statement to Fox News Digital. “These so-called civil rights groups aren’t advancing anything but hate and division, while the President is focused on uniting our country, improving our economy, securing our borders, and establishing peace across the globe,” Fields said in the statement. “This is the same vision for America that a record number of Black Americans supported in the resounding reelection of President Trump. The Democrats have sold out Black voters to appease their base, which consists of illegals, the pronoun police, purple-haired lunatics, and radical anti-Semites.” National Urban League President and CEO Marc Morial declared in the report, “The notion that we are living through a ‘state of emergency’ is not rhetorical flourish. It is an honest reckoning with a government increasingly determined to sacrifice its founding principles—equality, liberty, and justice—rather than accept the truth of a diversifying nation and deliver equitable opportunity to all.” DOJ INVESTIGATING MINNESOTA HIRING PRACTICES IN LATEST CLASH WITH WALZ The report claims that the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department has been twisted “into a tool for political retribution.” “Under its new leadership, the Civil Rights Division has been hollowed out and repurposed— transforming from a guardian of justice into a tool for political retribution,” the report asserts. “The radicalization of the DOJ is more than bureaucratic rot—it is an existential threat to civil rights enforcement, allowing discrimination to flourish unchecked under the false guise of ‘reverse racism.’” TRUMP ADMINISTRATION REFINES EEOC APPROACH TO TRANSGENDER WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION CLAIMS The report, which includes House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y. and several other U.S. lawmakers among the list of contributors, speaks favorably about diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts. “In short, DEI policies don’t just level the playing field in education and employment; they fortify democracy itself. By expanding opportunities, ensuring equitable access to information, and creating leadership pipelines, DEI helps guarantee that every American—not just the privileged few— can contribute to the nation’s future,” the report declares.
Trump Jr. rips ‘communist’ Mamdani with dire prediction about NYC if he wins mayoral race

NEW YORK, NY – Donald Trump, Jr., born and raised in New York City and heavily involved in the real estate market there, spoke to Fox News Digital about the prospects of the nation’s largest and most recognizable city possibly electing socialist Zohran Mamdani as its next mayor. “If what possibly could happen in November happens, I mean, it’s scary and, you know, perhaps that’s what New York needs,” the president’s son told Fox News Digital in New York City on Wednesday. “Maybe it has to fail to be able to come back, to be able to, you know, put the nail in the coffin of these ideas that have failed so many times around the world.” Trump Jr., who was at the New York Stock Exchange ringing the bell for the IPO of his latest business venture “GrabAGun,” told Fox News Digital that he expects a mass exodus from New York City to Florida if Mamdani is elected mayor. MAMDANI’S FATHER SITS ON COUNCIL OF ANTI-ISRAEL GROUP TIED TO TERROR, LEGITIMIZES ROLE OF SUICIDE BOMBERS “In New York, I think the stat I remembered, it was from like 10 years ago, but it was something like 18,000 people pay 80% of New York City’s city tax,” Trump Jr. said. “Well, those people are all very mobile. They can go wherever they want. This new mayor could possibly be the greatest marketing campaign for Florida ever to exist.” Trump continued, “But what happens to New York then? And as a lifelong New Yorker, as someone who grew up here, someone who changed the skyline here with my father for many years before he got into politics, that’s a scary notion, but perhaps it’s exactly what America needs. Sometimes you have to hit rock bottom, and I think if this communist mayor gets elected, rock bottom is what New York’s going to see.” MAMDANI’S FAILURE TO WALK BACK THESE POSITIONS COULD CAUSE RECKONING IN DEMOCRATIC PARTY: ‘FIVE-ALARM WARNING’ 1789 Capital founder and President Omeed Malik, Trump Jr.’s partner who orchestrated the special purpose acquisition merger of Grab-A-Gun, told Fox News Digital he believes Mamdani is just a “young version” of NYC’s former progressive mayor Bill de Blasio. “If you didn’t see it on the writing on the wall with de Blasio I don’t know what to tell you,” Malik said. “I definitely don’t want those people in Florida because if you haven’t already moved out of here you’ve got the wrong politics.” Mamdani burst onto the national political scene last month after winning the Democratic Primary for New York City mayor despite being a self-avowed “Democratic socialist” and bringing a track record of calls to defund the police, anti-Israel statements, and socialist economic principles to the ballot box. Fox News Digital reached out to the Mamdani campaign for comment. Like his son, President Trump referred to Mamdani as a “communist” this month, warning that New York City will “never be the same” if he’s victorious in November. “I’m not getting involved, but I can tell you this: I used to say we will not ever be a socialist country,” Trump said. “Right. Well, I’ll say it again. We’re not going to have — if a communist gets elected to run New York, it can never be the same.”
Democrats hit rock bottom as party plummets to all-time low: poll

Just 19% of voters questioned in a new national poll give Democrats in Congress a thumbs up on how they’re handling their duties, with 72% disapproving. That’s an all-time low since Quinnipiac University first began asking congressional approval questions in their surveys 16 years ago. The Democratic Party has been in the political wilderness since November’s elections, when Republicans won back control of the White House and the Senate and defended their fragile House majority. And Republicans made gains among Black, Hispanic and younger voters, all traditional members of the Democratic Party’s base. HEAD HERE TO CHECK OUT THE LATEST FOX NEWS POLLING Since President Donald Trump’s return to power earlier this year, an increasingly energized base of Democrats is urging party leaders to take a stronger stand in pushing back against the president’s sweeping and controversial second-term agenda. Their anger is directed not only at Republicans, but at Democrats they feel aren’t vocal enough in their opposition to Trump. And that’s fueled a plunge in the Democratic Party’s favorable ratings, which have hit historic lows in several surveys this year. FOUR MONTHS INTO TRUMP’S SECOND TERM, DEMOCRATS REMAIN DEEPLY PESSIMISTIC ABOUT THEIR PARTY The trend is reflected in the new Quinnipiac poll, which was conducted July 10-14. Just 39% of Democrats approve of the way Democrats in Congress are handling their jobs, with 52% disapproving and 9% not offering an opinion. “The approval numbers for Democrats can be characterized as flat out terrible,” Quinnipiac University polling analyst Tim Malloy said. While the approval ratings for Republicans in Congress aren’t as “terrible” as the Democrats, they’re nothing to brag about. Only a third of voters questioned in the poll said they approved of the way congressional Republicans were handling their duties, with 62% giving them a thumbs down. But just over three-quarters of Republicans (77%) said they approved of the way GOP lawmakers on Capitol Hill were handling their jobs, with just one in five disapproving. Forty percent of respondents approved of how Trump is handling his job as president, with 54% disapproving. Trump’s approval ratings were in positive territory during the first weeks of his second tour of duty in the White House. But the president’s poll numbers have been underwater in most, but not all, of the latest national surveys. Presidential and congressional approval ratings have long been closely watched barometers ahead of a midterm election. Republicans will be defending their slim House and Senate majorities in next year’s midterms, and will also be facing traditional headwinds that hamper the party in power.
SCOOP: House fiscal hawks warily accept Senate’s $9B Trump spending cuts package

FIRST ON FOX: Some House fiscal hawks are cautiously readying to accept the $9 billion spending cuts package passed by the Senate overnight. The House of Representatives must pass the bill, called a rescissions package, by Friday. Rescissions packages are spending cuts requested by the White House of funds that Congress already appropriated for that fiscal year. It’s a process that lets Republicans sideline Democrats by lowering the Senate’s threshold for passage from 60 votes to 51, but the request must be considered within 45 days. If that window passes, the funds must be re-obligated. 148 DEMOCRATS BACK NONCITIZEN VOTING IN DC AS GOP RAISES ALARM ABOUT FOREIGN AGENTS As of Thursday morning, at least three conservatives – Reps. Chip Roy, R-Texas, Tim Burchett, R-Tenn., and Ralph Norman, R-S.C. – signaled to Fox News Digital that they are leaning toward supporting it. It’s good news for House GOP leaders who are dealing with a razor-thin, three-vote margin. A group of House conservatives wrote to the Senate earlier this week warning them not to change any part of the original $9.4 billion spending cuts package – though they stopped short of threatening to vote against it. The Senate version of the bill rolled back a spending cut for an HIV/AIDS research program in Africa after concerns were raised by Senate Appropriations Committee Chair Susan Collins, R-Maine, and others. It wound up passing 51-48 after 2 a.m. on Thursday, with Collins and Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, voting against the bill. It’s highly unlikely the minimal change will stir a significant rebellion, particularly after the White House green-lit the change. But leaders can afford few missteps. Like the House, the Senate GOP’s majority is just three votes – and with all Democrats in both chambers prepared to vote against the legislation, Republicans are counting every vote. Roy told Fox News Digital he would support the bill on the House floor “if I understand what [the] Senate passed correctly.” Burchett said, “I think so,” when asked if he would vote for the bill, and Norman responded, “yes,” when asked as well. TAX CUTS, WORK REQUIREMENTS AND ASYLUM FEES: HERE’S WHAT’S INSIDE TRUMP’S BILL Of the three, just Norman signed conservatives’ letter warning, “In order to facilitate President Trump’s voter mandate, the Senate must pass the entire $9.4 billion of spending cuts in the rescission bill. Weakening any of these provisions would undermine both his leadership and the discipline our budget urgently demands.” The bill would cut roughly $8 billion from the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and $1 billion from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which deals federal grants to NPR and PBS. It’s expected to come before the House Rules Committee sometime Thursday, the final gatekeeper before a chamber-wide vote. If the House passes it on Thursday or Friday, it heads to President Donald Trump’s desk for a signature. Fox News Digital’s Alex Miller contributed to this report.
Trump’s NATO deal to arm Ukraine wins over GOP skeptics

Lawmakers long opposed to providing aid to Ukraine are now on board, if cautiously. President Donald Trump’s plan to assist the war effort comes with a twist because Washington won’t pay for the weapons sent to Kyiv. Months after calling Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy a “dictator” and questioning whether he even wanted to end the war with Russia, Trump has seemingly pivoted his frustrations to President Vladimir Putin. Now, the U.S. will provide weapons to Ukraine using European money. Even Vice President JD Vance is supportive of the move. NATO CHIEF PRAISES TRUMP’S WEAPONS SALES TO ALLIES AS ‘SIGNIFICANT’ MOVE THAT COULD FORCE PUTIN TO NEGOTIATE “Vice President Vance completely supports President Trump’s plan to save American taxpayers from indefinitely funding the conflict in Ukraine and remains committed to the president’s goal of ending the bloodshed in Eastern Europe,” a Vance spokesperson told Fox News Digital. “While Joe Biden stupidly sent billions of American tax dollars to Ukraine, President Trump put America first and smartly struck a deal that puts the onus on our allies in Europe to pay for the aid to Ukraine.” Under the Biden administration, Vance struck a different tone. TRUMP SAYS US WILL SEND PATRIOT MISSILES TO UKRAINE, ADDS THAT PUTIN ‘TALKS NICE AND THEN HE BOMBS EVERYBODY’ “This is not just a matter of dollars. Fundamentally, we lack the capacity to manufacture the amount of weapons Ukraine needs us to supply to win the war,” he wrote in a New York Times op-ed last year. “The Biden administration has no viable plan for the Ukrainians to win this war.” Less than two years ago, House Republicans ousted Speaker Kevin McCarthy over a “secret side deal” to fund Ukraine. Months later, Speaker Mike Johnson risked the same fate over a Ukraine package that most of his members voted down. But last week, Trump abruptly undid a Pentagon review that paused weapons shipments to Ukraine. Now, with Trump’s new Europe pays model, the weapons are flowing, and the resistance is fading. After repeatedly criticizing Zelenskyy and casting doubt on Ukraine’s war goals, Trump now says Putin may not be serious about peace. “We get a lot of bulls— thrown at us by Putin,” Trump said during a recent Cabinet meeting. “He’s very nice all the time, but it turns out to be meaningless.” The about-face has given Republican holdouts cover to reframe their positions — even if they remain skeptical. “I think they’re going to have to justify it, why now?” said Ralph Norman, R-S.C., who voted against all Ukraine supplemental funding packages. “When Biden was doing it, he didn’t know what he was doing. It was just money going to all different directions,” he added. “But there’ll be a lot of debate on it, as it should be.” The successful strikes on Iran’s nuclear sites were a win for interventionism, some lawmakers say, and have seemingly quieted isolationist sentiment. “I trust the generals right now,” Norman said when asked whether he believed more weapons would prolong or shorten the war. “They would do the right thing in Ukraine.” SENATE MOVES TO REIN IN TRUMP ADMINISTRATION’S FLUCTUATING UKRAINE POLICYFreshman Rep. Brandon Gill, R-Texas, said he still saw Trump’s policy as a return to “realism and restraint.” “Many people in this country have been burned by an overzealous foreign policy,” Gill said. “Getting involved in conflicts abroad without any understanding of what a path to peace would look like, what victory really means. And President Trump is reining that in. “He’s doing things a little bit differently, is getting NATO on board, and that’s a good thing.” In March, when the administration paused military aid, Gill had celebrated Trump “driving a knife right through the foreign policy UniParty.” Not everyone is on board. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, one of the president’s staunchest supporters who also spearheaded the effort to oust Johnson over Ukraine funding, suggested Americans were focused on affordability rather than aiding the war effort. “We do not want to give or sell weapons to Ukraine or be involved in any foreign wars or continue the never ending flow of foreign aid. We want to solve our own problems plaguing our own people,” she wrote on X. Rep. Andrew Clyde, R-Ga., called the new U.S.-NATO plan for Ukraine aid “great.” “I think more weapons will shorten [the war,]” he said. “We’re looking at NATO purchasing weapons from us. That’s a good thing right there.” “Putin needs to understand that our patience is running short. And he needs to understand it’s Vladimir Putin against the world,” said Rep. Derrick Van Orden, R-Wis. Last year, Van Orden railed against the Biden administration for failing to provide a plan to end the war. This time, the idea of Europe footing the bill seems to have sold him. “Europe has to step up and do the preponderance of their own defense,” he told Fox News Digital. Van Orden blamed the invasion on European NATO allies failing to meet their 2% goal for defense spending. “If the members of NATO had gone to 2% of GDP ten years ago when they promised to, do you think Vladimir Putin would have invaded Ukraine?” Van Orden wondered. CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP At a White House meeting Monday with NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte, Trump said a “very big deal” had been agreed to by Europeans to purchase. “Billions of dollars’ worth of military equipment is going to be purchased from the United States, going to NATO … And that’s going to be quickly distributed to the battlefield,” Trump said. Trump said the package would be comprehensive, including Patriot missile batteries that Ukraine needs for air defenses. “It’s everything. It’s Patriots. It’s all of them. It’s a full complement with the batteries,” Trump said.
Democrat congressman dragged for ‘weird’ TikTok ‘aura farming’ trend video

Rep. Suhas Subramanyam, D-Va., got in on TikTok’s “aura farming” trend, posting a clip of himself dancing solo in the congressional subway, captioned “omw to hold this administration accountable.” In the short clip, Subramanyam appears on the House subway wearing sunglasses, striking poses and waving his arms before locking in on the camera. Subramanyam’s “aura farming” appears to have backfired, with some commenters calling it out as tone-deaf, hypocritical and “cringe.” Left-leaning viewers frustrated with perceived inaction from Democrats under President Donald Trump took aim at the VA-10 congressman in the comment section. One of the top-liked comments asked flatly, “By doing nothing…?” Another read, “Representatives have got to stop doing this. Actually do something.” THE REVOLUTION WILL BE LIVESTREAMED: HOW ZOHRAN MAMDANI WON THE NYC PRIMARY ONLINE Many commenters linked the post to Subramanyam’s past voting record, including his controversial decision against his party just weeks ago not to move forward with a House impeachment resolution against Trump. On June 24, 2025, Subramanyam voted to table (i.e., block) a resolution to impeach President Trump over “high crimes and misdemeanors.” The resolution was introduced by Rep. Al Green, D-Texas, but was halted by a wide House majority. Several comments mocked the tone and delivery of the video. One read, “-1000 aura,” while another said, “Our taxpayer money hard at work…” Another commenter wrote, “So what exactly are you on your way to do? Because so far democrats have not really done anything at all.” A top comment simply read, “This feels weird idk.” FAR-LEFT LAWMAKER BREAKS SILENCE AFTER UNEARTHED SOCIAL MEDIA POST IGNITES FIRESTORM One lengthy reply said, “Not trying to be disrespectful. But? Less of this sh–. More fire on the floor please. I get wanting to do outreach. But this? Isn’t the action an average American needs from their representatives right now. We’re approaching no taxation without representation territory here. Do better.” Another suggested, “Introduce a new amendment for every one performative TikTok a Congress person posts they have to cosign 3 bills that work to limit the power of money in politics.” Subramanyam, a former tech advisor in the Obama White House and the first South Asian elected to Virginia’s General Assembly, has gained a reputation as a more moderate Democrat. He won Virginia’s 10th District in 2024 and often plays up his immigrant roots in political messaging. The “aura farming” trend, popular among Gen Z and Gen Alpha, refers to pulling off effortless, cool gestures usually while standing still. It took off after a now-viral video of 11-year-old Indonesian boy Rayyan Arkan Dikha danced stone-faced and confident while wearing sunglasses aboard a racing boat. Most “aura farming” clips on TikTok are soundtracked to “Young Black & Rich” by Melly Mike, which includes the lyric “I ain’t even gon’ get mad, I’m young, black and rich.” CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP Fox News Digital reached out to Subramanyam’s office and TikTok for comment.
Iran faces August deadline to accept comprehensive nuclear deal or face renewed UN sanctions

Iran has until the end of August to agree to a nuclear deal with the United States and its allies, Fox News has learned. Secretary of State Marco Rubio and the foreign ministers of France, Germany and the United Kingdom set the de facto deadline, according to three sources with knowledge of a call Wednesday among the officials. If Tehran fails to agree to a deal, it would trigger the “snapback” mechanism that automatically reimposes all sanctions previously imposed by the United Nations Security Council. IRAN’S LEADER THREATENS ‘EVEN BIGGER BLOW’ AGAINST US; TRUMP SAYS HE’S IN ‘NO RUSH’ TO TALK The sanctions were lifted under the 2015 Iran deal. The Trump administration has tried pressuring Iran to accept a deal to walk back its nuclear program after U.S. and Israeli strikes targeting nuclear sites. United Against Nuclear Iran, a nonprofit that opposes Tehran’s effort to develop a nuclear weapon, applauded Wednesday’s news. IRAN VOWS RETALIATION IF UN SECURITY COUNCIL ISSUES SNAPBACK SANCTIONS ON ANNIVERSARY OF NUCLEAR DEAL “Tehran has learned that, for the Trump administration, a deadline means a deadline,” UANI Chairman and former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and CEO Ambassador Mark D. Wallace said in a joint statement. “After failing to agree to a deal within 60 days of diplomacy, the United States and Israel undertook targeted military action against the regime in June. Consequently, Tehran should take this new deadline seriously.” On Monday, Iran warned it would retaliate if the U.N. Security Council imposes the snapback sanctions. “The threat to use the snapback mechanism lacks legal and political basis and will be met with an appropriate and proportionate response from the Islamic Republic of Iran,” Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei claimed during a press conference, according to a Reuters report. Baghaei didn’t specify how Tehran would retaliate.